The Official Hillary Campaign Machine

[Herman Hickman]

Note the classification of the document below when emails from Hillary Clinton's private, unsecured server were included as attachments.

http://www.grassley.senate.gov/site...s on Personal thumb drive. Clinton server.pdf

But Hillary Clinton never, ever had classified emails on her private server...

Clinton denies sending classified information from private email server | Fox News

And she never sent or received them either...

Hillary Clinton sent at least 60 emails with classified information, State Department finds | Daily Mail Online

If she had nothing to hide, then why clean the server before producing it to Federal authorities?

If she is innocent of wrongdoing, then why did she repeatedly lie about the information on her private server?

Wonder what someone who was around for Watergate would make of all this...

Wait a minute...

Let's find out...

Bob Woodward: Clinton emails 'reminds me of the Nixon tapes' | Washington Examiner

 

[theFallGuy]

Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remarked that she loves Snapchat because “Those messages disappear all by themselves” at the Iowa Democratic Wing Ding Dinner on Friday.

Hillary said, “By the way, you may have seen that I recently launched a Snapchat account. I love it. I love it. Those messages disappear all by themselves.”


what an arrogant POS

 

[FLVOL69]

Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remarked that she loves Snapchat because “Those messages disappear all by themselves” at the Iowa Democratic Wing Ding Dinner on Friday.

Hillary said, “By the way, you may have seen that I recently launched a Snapchat account. I love it. I love it. Those messages disappear all by themselves.”


what an arrogant POS

Watch how fast she disappears!

 

[lawgator1]

The analogy to Watergate is weak, on a lot of levels, but I get why the GOP wants to tout that. They've been trying to find something to counterweight that for 40 + years. The Clinton impeachment backfired on them, and they've been given this gift by Clinton, herself, and so that's going to be the big talking point.

The election is a year away. The fatigue factor is already building on this. Imagine it in a year.

 

[theFallGuy]

The analogy to Watergate is weak, on a lot of levels, but I get why the GOP wants to tout that. They've been trying to find something to counterweight that for 40 + years. The Clinton impeachment backfired on them, and they've been given this gift by Clinton, herself, and so that's going to be the big talking point.

The election is a year away. The fatigue factor is already building on this. Imagine it in a year.

hate to bust your bubble:

"2. It won't go away any time soon.

The State Department will take months to go through the 55,000 emails Clinton has turned over to them (which isn't even all of the emails); congressional Republicans will hold hearings until Election Day; and Republican presidential candidates will be sure to keep beating the drum."

3 Reasons Democrats Are Freaking Out About Hillary Clinton : It's All Politics : NPR

 

[hog88]

The analogy to Watergate is weak, on a lot of levels, but I get why the GOP wants to tout that. They've been trying to find something to counterweight that for 40 + years. The Clinton impeachment backfired on them, and they've been given this gift by Clinton, herself, and so that's going to be the big talking point.

The election is a year away. The fatigue factor is already building on this. Imagine it in a year.

Imagine in a year, she might be under indictment.

But seriously LG, your defense of the indefensible is reaching new heights.

 

[AirVol]

What we do know is that there is a serious leak of classified information on an unencrypted server, leaving it wide open to exploitation by foreign intelligence services.

Her security clearances need to be withdrawn and her actions disqualifies her for office. PERIOD.
Many other people who have made the same careless actions have served prison sentences, why hasn't she been arrested?

 

[FLVOL69]

Imagine in a year, she might be under indictment.

But seriously LG, your defense of the indefensible is reaching new heights.

He's had a ****load of practice these past 6 plus years..

 

[FLVOL69]

What we do know is that there is a serious leak of classified information on an unencrypted server, leaving it wide open to exploitation by foreign intelligence services.

Her security clearances need to be withdrawn and her actions disqualifies her for office. PERIOD.
Many other people who have made the same careless actions have served prison sentences, why hasn't she been arrested?

$$

 

[BeecherVol]

The analogy to Watergate is weak, on a lot of levels, but I get why the GOP wants to tout that. They've been trying to find something to counterweight that for 40 + years. The Clinton impeachment backfired on them, and they've been given this gift by Clinton, herself, and so that's going to be the big talking point.

The election is a year away. The fatigue factor is already building on this. Imagine it in a year.

It doesnt matter what happens with her. What she did, what she didnt do. Campaign on! Nothing else matters.

Basically, Im voting for her regardless of the wishy washy posts I have previously made.

 

[AirVol]

Anvil Joe and Pocahontas are waiting in the shadows in case something happens to the correnated One.

 

[lawgator1]

It doesnt matter what happens with her. What she did, what she didnt do. Campaign on! Nothing else matters.

Basically, Im voting for her regardless of the wishy washy posts I have previously made.

I've not made up my mind who I am voting for, have you?

I could easily see boycotting this one in disgust.

 

[malinoisvol]

The analogy to Watergate is weak, on a lot of levels, but I get why the GOP wants to tout that. They've been trying to find something to counterweight that for 40 + years. The Clinton impeachment backfired on them, and they've been given this gift by Clinton, herself, and so that's going to be the big talking point.

The election is a year away. The fatigue factor is already building on this. Imagine it in a year.

Just to let you know, LBJ was Nixon's mentor.
https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=k-sDAAAAIBAJ&pg=1893,4176767&hl=en

 

[BearCat204]

I've not made up my mind who I am voting for, have you?

I could easily see boycotting this one in disgust.

Partly true, depends on who wins the D nomination. Saying otherwise is just another log on that BS fire you have had going on here for nearly a decade. If they put a brown paper bag up there as the D nomination, you would be the first in line to cast your vote for them.

 

[Septic]

What we do know is that there is a serious leak of classified information on an unencrypted server, leaving it wide open to exploitation by foreign intelligence services.

What classified information was leaked?

Her security clearances need to be withdrawn and her actions disqualifies her for office. PERIOD.

Yep.

Many other people who have made the same careless actions have served prison sentences, why hasn't she been arrested?

Who else hosted there own email server and went to jail?

 

[Grand Vol]

Who else hosted there own email server and went to jail?

That wasn't what he was implying. Many other people have not properly secured classified information and received significant penalties as well as jail time.

Actions that may have been accidental, but still a serious breech of security. Hers were on purpose and she's acting like it's not a big deal.

 

[malinoisvol]

That wasn't what he was implying. Many other people have not properly secured classified information and received significant penalties as well as jail time.

Actions that may have been accidental, but still a serious breech of security. Hers were on purpose and she's acting like it's not a big deal.

Leave a classified safe unlocked, in a locked room, in a locked building, and see what happens.

 

[BearCat204]

Leave a classified safe unlocked, in a locked room, in a locked building, and see what happens.

Of even put anything that is classified on a personal thumb drive and see what happens.

 

[Grand Vol]

Partly true, depends on who wins the D nomination. Saying otherwise is just another log on that BS fire you have had going on here for nearly a decade. If they put a brown paper bag up there as the D nomination, you would be the first in line to cast your vote for them.

 

[lawgator1]

I don't know how many times I have to say this:

I DO NOT LIKE HILLARY CLINTON.

The fact that I do not like her is not mutually exclusive of my criticism of the logic of the attacks being made against her. Don't confuse the two.

 

[Septic]

That wasn't what he was implying. Many other people have not properly secured classified information and received significant penalties as well as jail time.

Actions that may have been accidental, but still a serious breech of security. Hers were on purpose and she's acting like it's not a big deal.

"we do know is that there is a serious leak of classified information"

It wasn't an implication - he said there was a "serious leak of classified info."

I hadn't heard that. The fact that she had stuff on a personal server is egregious, I don't disagree. But I hadn't heard the we "knew" of a "serious leak". Those are two different things.

As far as her intentionally or accidentally doing it - I suppose that's debatable. Depending on where one sits it dictate what one sees. Personally, I don't believe that kind of opsec stupidity (intentional or not) should be eligible to hold a secret clearance.

 

[BearCat204]

I don't know how many times I have to say this:

I DO NOT LIKE HILLARY CLINTON.

The fact that I do not like her is not mutually exclusive of my criticism of the logic of the attacks being made against her. Don't confuse the two.

You can say it until you pass the **** out, but every soul knows that if she wins the primary, you're voting for her no matter what.

 

[malinoisvol]

No way in hell you can have classified and not know it.

With that said, it is up to the "Originator" to classify, iirc, and that could be a weak argument for an out for her.

 

[FLVOL69]

I don't know how many times I have to say this:

I DO NOT LIKE HILLARY CLINTON.

The fact that I do not like her is not mutually exclusive of my criticism of the logic of the attacks being made against her. Don't confuse the two.

$$

 

[Mtntrout]

I've not made up my mind who I am voting for, have you?

I could easily see boycotting this one in disgust.

What are your initial thoughts on Bernie Sanders?