Von Pearson WILL NOT be charged

#401
#401
BearCat204 said:
Do you have any clue about what you are blabbering on and on about? If UT decides that he has violated their code on conduct, they can boot him and there isnt a thing he can do about it. Exactly on what grounds would he be able to sue?
Click to expand...

Yes I do you dodo. His attorney can invent any number of creative reasons to sue, and if Von is "booted,"
and you must think he needs to be, then legal action will undoubtedly ensue.

BTW, do you have any idea what you're blathering about when you hit the keyboard? I dont think you do to be
honest. I certainly haven't seen any evidence of it. BTW, that word evidence.... thats something the cops don't have.

Von is in a pretty strong position IMO, you're just running your mouth. :banghead2:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#403
#403
HoptownVol said:
Yes I do you dodo. His attorney can invent any number of creative reasons to sue, and if Von is "booted,"
and you must think he needs to be, then legal action will undoubtedly ensue.

BTW, do you have any idea what you're blathering about when you hit the keyboard? I dont think you do to be
honest. I certainly haven't seen any evidence of it. BTW, that word evidence.... thats something the cops don't have.

Von is in a pretty strong position IMO, you're just running your mouth. :banghead2:
Click to expand...


Hilarious, you still havent posted what you would come up with as far as grounds to sue if UT determined that they feel he violated a code of conduct. He can sue all day long for anything, but good luck getting it to go anywhere. I want him back as much as anyone, but if the University decides he violated something, even as much as acting inappropriately, they can certainly do so. Hopefully he will be fully reinstated by the end of the week, but you should know how these things go sometimes considering who holds his fate in their hands at UT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#405
#405
BearCat204 said:
Hilarious, you still havent posted what you would come up with as far as grounds to sue if UT determined that they feel he violated a code of conduct. He can sue all day long for anything, but good luck getting it to go anywhere. I want him back as much as anyone, but if the University decides he violated something, even as much as acting inappropriately, they can certainly do so.
Click to expand...


Excuse me while I go graduate law school.

Thats got to be the dumbest post I've ever seen. You think the courts give a crap about UT's vague,
fluid, and contradicting rules of conduct? No, it doesnt. Still running your mouth, and looking pretty silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#407
#407
HoptownVol said:
Excuse me while I go graduate law school.

Thats got to be the dumbest post I've ever seen. You think the courts give a crap about UT's vague,
fluid, and contradicting rules of conduct? No, it doesnt. Still running your mouth, and looking pretty silly.
Click to expand...


You dont have to be a law student to know that you have a pretty poor case if you wanted to sue in this situation. Again, what grounds would he be able to sue for, still havent answered that question internet tough guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#408
#408
BearCat204 said:
You dont have to be a law student to know that you have a pretty poor case if you wanted to sue in this situation. Again, what grounds would he be able to sue for, still havent answered that question internet tough guy.
Click to expand...


Tough guy? What should I brand you... wait I know.... cant post it on the board, dont want to embarrass
you any more than you already have yourself.

The lawyers dont actually need to cite specificity to file a suit against the school to force their hand to
reinstate VP. They can claim pretty much anything they want at this point. You apparently are on
the side of the administration?

So Mr Internet Confusion Specialist, do you believe Von should remain suspended, or denied
readmission? Answer the question, I dont have all day, and please..... be specific! :eek:lol:
 
#409
#409
Why would a guy who just spent months beating a rape charge do anything to risk additional info getting out that might fuel a civil suit down the road once he's getting paid.
 
#410
#410
HoptownVol said:
Tough guy? What should I brand you... wait I know.... cant post it on the board, dont want to embarrass
you any more than you already have yourself.

The lawyers dont actually need to cite specificity to file a suit against the school to force their hand to
reinstate VP. They can claim pretty much anything they want at this point. You apparently are on
the side of the administration?

So Mr Internet Confusion Specialist, do you believe Von should remain suspended, or denied
readmission? Answer the question, I dont have all day, and please..... be specific! :eek:lol:
Click to expand...
First I even said they can sue for whatever they want, but good luck going anywhere with it if UT determines that he violated some code of conduct, they don't have to let him back. Secondly, I am absolutely not on the administrations side on this and unless there is some smoking gun that he did something inappropriate, the admin should and would face an onslaught of public outcry of they upheld the suspension without sufficient evidence as determined by the administration. On the surface of this I would say let him back in and let him play, but the hypothetical was if they withheld the suspension and if they did, I am sure they would have their ducks in a row and have a reasonable reason to. You are suggesting that Von could successfully sue the University of they felt he violated a code of conduct and suspended him, even though the DA wouldn't prosecute due to insufficient evidence, which is certainly not the case.
 
Last edited:
#413
#413
BearCat204 said:
First I even said they can sue for whatever they want, but good luck going anywhere with it if UT determines that he violated some code of conduct, they don't have to let him back. Secondly, I am absolutely not on the administrations side on this and unless there is some smoking gun that he did something inappropriate, the admin should and would face an onslaught of public outcry of they withheld the suspension without sufficient evidence as determined by the administration. On the surface of this I would say let him back in and let him play, but the hypothetical was if they withheld the suspension and if they did, I am sure they would have their ducks in a row and have a reasonable reason to. You are suggesting that Von could successfully sue the University of they felt he violated a code of conduct and suspended him, even though the DA wouldn't prosecute due to insufficient evidence, which is certainly not the case.
Click to expand...



Thanks Mr Wall-O-Words. Didnt read a single line of that rant. You just went on ignore. Long overdue. Sorry. Here's a hanky. :banghead2:
 
#414
#414
gule said:
Von should just tell Butch & UT to gth & take his talent to the pros asap. They have treated him like crap, imho
Click to expand...

"ASAP" is after this season...bout the same timetable.
 
#416
#416
BearCat204 said:
Hilarious, you still havent posted what you would come up with as far as grounds to sue if UT determined that they feel he violated a code of conduct. He can sue all day long for anything, but good luck getting it to go anywhere. I want him back as much as anyone, but if the University decides he violated something, even as much as acting inappropriately, they can certainly do so. Hopefully he will be fully reinstated by the end of the week, but you should know how these things go sometimes considering who holds his fate in their hands at UT.
Click to expand...

UT better give him due process before making that determination. See the circus FSU put on to hear Winston's case as an example of what that looks like. If UT has some higher-up stick his finger in the air, feel the wind direction, and announce "violation," as you suggest, there likely will be a problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#417
#417
EZE said:
UT better give him due process before making that determination. See the circus FSU put on to hear Winston's case as an example of what that looks like. If UT has some higher-up stick his finger in the air, feel the wind direction, and announce "violation," as you suggest, there likely will be a problem.
Click to expand...


Might as well be talking to a brick wall. He doesnt even know what he's defending. LOL
 
#419
#419
BearCat204 said:
You dont have to be a law student to know that you have a pretty poor case if you wanted to sue in this situation. Again, what grounds would he be able to sue for, still havent answered that question internet tough guy.
Click to expand...

I don't know if this would give Pearson grounds for anything, but there were 2 recent players who were actually charged with rape who were allowed to continue with school. So to me, would look awful suspicious to say they didn't violate code of conduct but Pearson did. Unless the other case didn't involve another UT student, which I haven't kept up enough with to know if it did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#420
#420
So how does AJ with a trial pending get to walk with his graduating class and VP with no charges filed have to sit tight? None of this noise is right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#421
#421
EZE said:
UT better give him due process before making that determination. See the circus FSU put on to hear Winston's case as an example of what that looks like. If UT has some higher-up stick his finger in the air, feel the wind direction, and announce "violation," as you suggest, there likely will be a problem.
Click to expand...
Winston's case wouldn't be the best example to use in a situation like this. UT just has to give due process, but they don't have to agree with the DA's decision.
 
#423
#423
GAVol said:
Why would a guy who just spent months beating a rape charge do anything to risk additional info getting out that might fuel a civil suit down the road once he's getting paid.
Click to expand...

Only explanation would be there is zero additional info possible that could hurt him. I hope that is the case.
 
#424
#424
OrangeSquid said:
One would hope that after at least 3 months, that decision would have been made by now. Either he did or he didn't. Is it not that simple?:confused:
Click to expand...

One would think, but if it was such an open and shut case, why did it take so long for the DA to come to this conclusion. None of us likely know the whole story or even have all the info that the university does.
 
#425
#425
Jnunn said:
If the DA cant charge you they have basically nothing. They can charge you with a shred of evidence. So in other words, Von is legally innocent and should be reinstated. It is insane to keep him suspended when he is legally innocent, not even charged. It would be like me accusing you of assaulting me with no evidence, and your job keeping you suspended even though I had nothing.

Just for comparisons sake, grand jurys indict something like 99% of cases. It takes literally nothing to get indicted. That Von didnt even get charged speaks HUGE volumes.
Click to expand...

Agreed.....anyone can accuse anyone of anything at anytime. (Duke Lacrosse Players) but that does not mean its true. I am glad VP was not indicted which means the DA did not have any evidence or enough evidence. Now the University needs to step up and render a fast decision on the future of VP. Personally, I hope to see VP back in orange and soon! GBO!!
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top