Obama admin has done a good job managing the economic crisis of Bush

#201
#201
KentheOrange said:
You haven't been paying attention. Research just how many top military leaders have been forced to resign after a meeting with the POTUS. Look at the reduction in military budgets (not necessarily a bad thing but not as an across the board exercise).

Take a look at when our military can defend themselves and ask yourself if you would want to serve under those rules.
Click to expand...

Yeah,the jackarse is definately trying to destroy the military.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#204
#204
The Pentagon has offered up a grab bag of reasons for these dismissals — from a simple “loss of confidence,” to more descriptive “insensitive remarks,” “sexual misconduct,” and even “counterfeit poker chips.”

The latest two to fall from grace, Navy Vice Adm. Ted “Twig” Branch, director of naval intelligence, and Rear Adm. Bruce Loveless, director of intelligence operations, were stripped of their security clearances last week, effectively ending their careers. They allegedly engaged in “inappropriate conduct” over a Navy contracting scandal related to scheduling port visits in Southeast Asia during the past decade. According to Navy officials, the probe into Singapore-based Glenn Defense Marine Asia is expected to widen — meaning, we’ll likely see other senior officers terminated in the weeks ahead.


Yes knuckle draggers, it's clear that President Obama is going out of his way to put in place communist military leaders. That the senior military officials who replaced them somehow couldnt do a better job and this has been the in works since he was born in kenya. My gosh it worked!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#205
#205
#VFL__ said:
The Pentagon has offered up a grab bag of reasons for these dismissals — from a simple “loss of confidence,” to more descriptive “insensitive remarks,” “sexual misconduct,” and even “counterfeit poker chips.”

The latest two to fall from grace, Navy Vice Adm. Ted “Twig” Branch, director of naval intelligence, and Rear Adm. Bruce Loveless, director of intelligence operations, were stripped of their security clearances last week, effectively ending their careers. They allegedly engaged in “inappropriate conduct” over a Navy contracting scandal related to scheduling port visits in Southeast Asia during the past decade. According to Navy officials, the probe into Singapore-based Glenn Defense Marine Asia is expected to widen — meaning, we’ll likely see other senior officers terminated in the weeks ahead.


Yes knuckle draggers, it's clear that President Obama is going out of his way to put in place communist military leaders. That the senior military officials who replaced them somehow couldnt do a better job and this been the in works since he was born in kenya. My gosh it worked!
Click to expand...

Ouck Fbama
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#207
#207
#VFL__ said:
The Pentagon has offered up a grab bag of reasons for these dismissals — from a simple “loss of confidence,” to more descriptive “insensitive remarks,” “sexual misconduct,” and even “counterfeit poker chips.”

The latest two to fall from grace, Navy Vice Adm. Ted “Twig” Branch, director of naval intelligence, and Rear Adm. Bruce Loveless, director of intelligence operations, were stripped of their security clearances last week, effectively ending their careers. They allegedly engaged in “inappropriate conduct” over a Navy contracting scandal related to scheduling port visits in Southeast Asia during the past decade. According to Navy officials, the probe into Singapore-based Glenn Defense Marine Asia is expected to widen — meaning, we’ll likely see other senior officers terminated in the weeks ahead.


Yes knuckle draggers, it's clear that President Obama is going out of his way to put in place communist military leaders. That the senior military officials who replaced them somehow couldnt do a better job and this has been the in works since he was born in kenya. My gosh it worked!
Click to expand...

You are one naive little boy.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#210
#210
You'd have to be an absolute nutjob to claim Obama was intentionally trying to destroy the American military. In order for that to make any sense, you'd have to think he's some sort of Communist super spy plant from Russia or China with a mission to destroy the country from the inside out. I mean, you'd have to be a level ten conspiracy wizard.

Oh, right. This is volnation. Makes sense. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#211
#211
Vol8188 said:
So you're telling me the out of control spending republicans always blame Obama for is all bs?
Click to expand...

I think that you and CC have the biggest comprehension issues and post the most incomprehensible statements on all of VN. Keith's posts are at least understandable if you read them enough. Someone calls you and CC on your BS and you just post something nonsensical like it is an intelligent answer. And I actually like CC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#213
#213
Dave1967 said:
Time to ignore
Click to expand...

Don't do that, you just let the genius math teacher/financial expert win. Some of his BS is too precious to miss. Kind of like a kid with downs winning the 10 yard dash. You are proud they made the effort but feel sorry for them at the same time.
 
#215
#215
MercyPercy said:
You'd have to be an absolute nutjob to claim Obama was intentionally trying to destroy the American military. In order for that to make any sense, you'd have to think he's some sort of Communist super spy plant from Russia or China with a mission to destroy the country from the inside out. I mean, you'd have to be a level ten conspiracy wizard.

Oh, right. This is volnation. Makes sense. :)
Click to expand...

Destroy may be a strong choice of words, but trying to say he isn't weakening it is just foolish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#216
#216
Carl Pickens said:
Destroy may be a strong choice of words, but trying to say he isn't weakening it is just foolish.
Click to expand...

I don't think he has weakened the military. He has changed the military for the better via the use of modern technology. I rather see a drone do it's thing any day vs putting troops in harms way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#217
#217
Gramps said:
I don't think he has weakened the military. He has changed the military for the better via the use of modern technology. I rather see a drone do it's thing any day vs putting troops in harms way.
Click to expand...

Since when do 4star generals and Admirals fight on the front lines? These men wouldn't kiss Barry's royal ass and they paid the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#218
#218
Vol8188 said:
That's like taking out a bunch of credit cards and claiming you've fixed your money problems. Taking on debt my help short term, but it has very negative long term consequences
Click to expand...

:lolabove::lolabove::lolabove:And what exactly has Obola been doing the last 6 years?
 
#220
#220
Vol8188 said:
Obamas budgets have never appeared that bad to me, and by most all accounts have shown a decrease in spending over the previous administration.
Click to expand...

ummmm math's not your strong suit is it?
Do you have any concept of how big a trillion is? Nevermind 18 of 'em...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#224
#224
SpaceCoastVol said:
What, that you can't do math? Yeah it hurts, because it is people like you that elect morons like Obola
Click to expand...

Bush 2009 budget-3.518 trillion

Obama 2010-3.456 trillion
Obama 2011-3.603 trillion
Obama 2012-3.538 trillion
Obama 2013-3.45 trillion
Obama 2014-3.5 trillion

If you look at obamas budgets compared to Bushs final budget, you will see that spending has been below that level in 3 of 5 years. You will also see that discretionary spending is down.
 
Last edited:
#225
#225
Vol8188 said:
Bush 2009 budget-3.518 trillion

Obama 2010-3.456 trillion
Obama 2011-3.603 trillion
Obama 2012-3.538 trillion
Obama 2013-3.45 trillion
Obama 2014-3.5 trillion

If you look at obamas budgets compared to Bushs final budget, you will see that spending has been below that level in 3 of 5 years. You will also see that discretionary spending is down.
Click to expand...

Source....
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top