govols/cc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 20,553
- Likes
- 1,366
Same way it's fair that my $1,000 procedure cost me $10,000 because I have to pay for uninsured low-lifes.
As I've said in the past, I'm all for hospitals being allowed to reject care based on lack of proof of ability to pay, just like a bank would for a mortgage. Of course there are a lot of holes in this as well.
Same way it's fair that my $1,000 procedure cost me $10,000 because I have to pay for uninsured low-lifes.
As I've said in the past, I'm all for hospitals being allowed to reject care based on lack of proof of ability to pay, just like a bank would for a mortgage. Of course there are a lot of holes in this as well.
My mistake. I meant to put that it should not be a business. You shouldn't make a profit for treating cancer, just like you shouldn't profit from investigating a homocide or putting out a fire.
Health care is a public good. I do not think that hospitals and doctors should be government employees. But I do think that there should be a single payor system. Now before you go ape claiming that they would pay so poorly that it would be a disincentive to medical providers, I'll point out that most insurance companies already use the feds system of DRG codes to assign reimbursement, and providers accept that.