JoeKyleVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,165
- Likes
- 497
You are going to have to explain this one. This makes no sense.
There are those who argue that truth and logic do not exist.
If I say the world is not logical, I must use logic to argue that logic does not exist. Thus, I establish what I am trying to deny.
I cannot argue that there exists a possible world without logic, as that would mean I would have to use logic to establish that such a world exists. The same principle applies as the above.
Logic, as it exists, is all-pervading. It must exist in every possible world. Now, the laws of nature and their mathematical constants can differ from possible world to possible world, as they are not logically necessary.
The following is not a critique of you, but of many atheistic arguments I have encountered: Some atheists want to argue about what is logical all day until we get to the logical problems of a self-caused universe, where they then throw logic to the wind. I find such thought processes mind-boggling and hypocritical. Theists are supposedly irrational because they believe in a God, but atheists are perfectly rational to believe in multiverses and (literally) illogical pre-BB worlds?
