Ferguson Riots

#5,351
#5,351
mrorange211 said:
Sure. But it's not just one witness. This has happened with many of the witnesses, almost all of which are African-American as well, including those that agreed with Wilson's side of the story (for the most part).
Click to expand...

my point was

evidence>>>>>>>>>>>any witness statement.

therefore it is not a 'cloudy' issue of what happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,352
#5,352
hog88 said:
What slaves did Lincoln free?
Click to expand...


images
 
#5,355
#5,355
Grand Vol said:
I dated a girl who played soccer before. I thought football was rough until I saw the aftermath of 22 women beating each other senseless trying to get the ball.
Click to expand...

You just described my typical Saturday night before meeting mcmom.
 
#5,356
#5,356
Lets all be honest here about what seems to have happened.

18 year old man commits robbery. Officer identifies said suspect from description and confronts him. Suspect then becomes aggressive with officer. Once separated after an initial gunshot from inside the car the officer demands him to get down or surrender. 18 year old begins to charge the man who fires more shots...(understood from assault which just took place). Says again to get down...(this is all testimony by the way which is backed up by audio recording they have). Suspect charges again and officer ends up fatally shooting him. "Witnesses" see white cop kill a black kid. Tensions are always high and apparently from statements there is a strong racism of the blacks in that area towards whites. The story begins to gain all kinds of legs...."He had his hands up" "he was surrendering" "He was on the ground" "officer shot him in the back as he ran away". The stories get so out of proportion national media and civil rights leaders show up demanding justice. Contrary to these stories however are other black witnesses who state Michael Brown charged at the officer in a football manner--(stated by the prosecutor last night). 3 separate forensic autopsy's confirm accounts from said witnesses and the officer. Facing the physical evidence previous "witness" statements change and continue to contradict. All evidence now is put before grand jury who decides not to indict as it seems an officer doing his job. Now large contingencies of african american people who are more racist than the white people get upset because they want the white cop to be prosecuted. There is no innocent until proven guilty because it was a black 18 year old criminal. Media uses statistics about how 1 in 3 black men will have to face prison throughout their life which has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the crime they are committing but use it to fit a race and political agenda, all the while claiming to be on the side of tolerance and social and civil rights but wanting to take the rights of the white person because they themselves are so blinded by racism toward whites they can't see the foolishness with which they speak.

Does that pretty well sum it up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#5,358
#5,358
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
For those propping Lincoln up on his usual pedestal, I offer this book.

The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War https://www.amazon.com/dp/0761526463/ref=cm_sw_r_awd_JxlDub1C0KB94
Click to expand...

This book has more holes in it then a piece of Swiss. Historians openly mock it in class; frequently.

Here is an excerpt from one of the reviews:

Thomas DiLorenzo wouldn’t recognize the real Lincoln if he showed up in a top hat and an ill-fitting black suit and beat him upside the head with a cane. And, if the real Lincoln ever did read this book, he’d have more than enough material for one of the biggest libel judgments of all time. To give a full refutation of the many errors of this book would require a vastly larger note than this book deserves, but the book’s major and fundamental flaws as well as complete non sequitor arguments need to be mentioned so that any would-be reader of this book is given fair advance warning of its extremely flawed approach.
Click to expand...
 
#5,359
#5,359
jordan4vols said:
Lets all be honest here about what seems to have happened.

18 year old man commits robbery. Officer identifies said suspect from description and confronts him. Suspect then becomes aggressive with officer. Once separated after an initial gunshot from inside the car the officer demands him to get down or surrender. 18 year old begins to charge the man who fires more shots...(understood from assault which just took place). Says again to get down...(this is all testimony by the way which is backed up by audio recording they have). Suspect charges again and officer ends up fatally shooting him. "Witnesses" see white cop kill a black kid. Tensions are always high and apparently from statements there is a strong racism of the blacks in that area towards whites. The story begins to gain all kinds of legs...."He had his hands up" "he was surrendering" "He was on the ground" "officer shot him in the back as he ran away". The stories get so out of proportion national media and civil rights leaders show up demanding justice. Contrary to these stories however are other black witnesses who state Michael Brown charged at the officer in a football manner--(stated by the prosecutor last night). 3 separate forensic autopsy's confirm accounts from said witnesses and the officer. Facing the physical evidence previous "witness" statements change and continue to contradict. All evidence now is put before grand jury who decides not to indict as it seems an officer doing his job. Now large contingencies of african american people who are more racist than the white people get upset because they want the white cop to be prosecuted. There is no innocent until proven guilty because it was a black 18 year old criminal. Media uses statistics about how 1 in 3 black men will have to face prison throughout their life which has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the crime they are committing but use it to fit a race and political agenda, all the while claiming to be on the side of tolerance and social and civil rights but wanting to take the rights of the white person because they themselves are so blinded by racism toward whites they can't see the foolishness with which they speak.

Does that pretty well sum it up?
Click to expand...

Perfectly
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    77.1 KB · Views: 4
#5,360
#5,360
jordan4vols said:
Lets all be honest here about what seems to have happened.

18 year old man commits robbery. Officer identifies said suspect from description and confronts him. Suspect then becomes aggressive with officer. Once separated after an initial gunshot from inside the car the officer demands him to get down or surrender. 18 year old begins to charge the man who fires more shots...(understood from assault which just took place). Says again to get down...(this is all testimony by the way which is backed up by audio recording they have). Suspect charges again and officer ends up fatally shooting him. "Witnesses" see white cop kill a black kid. Tensions are always high and apparently from statements there is a strong racism of the blacks in that area towards whites. The story begins to gain all kinds of legs...."He had his hands up" "he was surrendering" "He was on the ground" "officer shot him in the back as he ran away". The stories get so out of proportion national media and civil rights leaders show up demanding justice. Contrary to these stories however are other black witnesses who state Michael Brown charged at the officer in a football manner--(stated by the prosecutor last night). 3 separate forensic autopsy's confirm accounts from said witnesses and the officer. Facing the physical evidence previous "witness" statements change and continue to contradict. All evidence now is put before grand jury who decides not to indict as it seems an officer doing his job. Now large contingencies of african american people who are more racist than the white people get upset because they want the white cop to be prosecuted. There is no innocent until proven guilty because it was a black 18 year old criminal. Media uses statistics about how 1 in 3 black men will have to face prison throughout their life which has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the crime they are committing but use it to fit a race and political agenda, all the while claiming to be on the side of tolerance and social and civil rights but wanting to take the rights of the white person because they themselves are so blinded by racism toward whites they can't see the foolishness with which they speak.

Does that pretty well sum it up?
Click to expand...

the officer called it in (saw a suspect) before beginning the confrontation.

and to appease more people you may want to mention bad parenting as that comes up a lot. but overall very well done.
 
#5,364
#5,364
mrorange211 said:
This book has more holes in it then a piece of Swiss. Historians openly mock it in class; frequently.

Here is an excerpt from one of the reviews:
Click to expand...

Historians? Do you mean historians with an agenda? Left leaning historians who believe in state power and that everything good comes from government. Haha you're funny.
History is written by the winners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,369
#5,369
Septic said:
Did you see the black ferguson council woman and Sean Hannity go at it last night?

She started rolling her eyes, gettin' loud and then went into what I call 'disrespected black woman in walmart' mode. It was awesome.
Click to expand...

I love this mode, almost run into this everyday, some folks know what I'm talking bout..
 
#5,373
#5,373
There was a body found shot to death and burned in a car this morning in Ferguson. Also does anyone expect round two today?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top