Ferguson Riots

Who the **** are these "reporters"

Holy ****. If this q&a session isn't an indictment of the media, I don't know what it. Good lord
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
No, he simply repeated some of the variance in the stories. The only time he flatly said the physical evidence contradicted testimony was placement of wounds, that kind of thing. I didn't hear it as saying people, as much as some perceptions, were discounted.

he flat out gave numerous examples of "eye witness" testimony being in conflict with physical evidence. Clearly, the witnesses who testified Brown was running away or shot in the back were deemed to be unreliable witnesses - he said that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I'm worried that a juror who disagreed with the outcome and wants to be famous might go public with that. Write a book. Cause more tumult where none is needed.

Okay. I was thinking the same thing at one point. I wouldn't say might as much as "likely will."
 
Advertisement





Back
Top