govols/cc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 20,553
- Likes
- 1,366
I'm not sure, I'll have to check with Batman and get back with you. Pillock.
You keep pushing this retarded claim, but you refuse to back it up. Why is 148ft or approximately 50 yards, why is this relevant?
It's equilivent to me proclaiming "Michael brown died 2,500 miles from Texas, therefore this was not self defense".
Why does this distance matter? You've still not even tried to establish that.
Because I assumed everyone knew the shots were fired BY WILSON in close proximity to the vehicle. Say within a 10ft area of the suv. If Brown was running away and was at least 148 feet or 50 yards or even 40 yards away from Wilson, that does not justify the use of deadly force. He fell facing the suv, that goes with reports that he had his hands up. Look at where the wounds are on the arms.
Didn't the original reports claim the whole crime scene was contained within 35 feet?
Because I assumed everyone knew the shots were fired BY WILSON in close proximity to the vehicle. Say within a 10ft area of the suv. If Brown was running away and was at least 148 feet or 50 yards or even 40 yards away from Wilson, that does not justify the use of deadly force. He fell facing the suv, that goes with reports that he had his hands up. Look at where the wounds are on the arms.
Didn't the original reports claim the whole crime scene was contained within 35 feet?
Did Brown get shot in the back? How do you know Wilson was within 10 feet of his vehicle? Multiple arm shots with arm extended away from body would be some good shoitin'.
I've never read a report that didn't say Wilson chased the suspect. So where do you get that he was 10ft from the SUV?
How far does the report say he chased Brown? Couldn't have been a long distance as the body is 148 feet from the vehicle.(according to that article) Perhaps I'm wrong in assuming the shots were fired from close proximity to the vehicle, we don't really know what happened.
Most reports claim Wilson chased the suspect and then the suspect came back towards him and engaged him.
I didn't know that, I've not followed this as closely as most of you have. I just pick up bits and pieces here and there of what supposedly happened. I don't really follow news stories much. It's pointless these days.
Question. Didn't original reports claim Wilson received a crushed orbital socket in the confrontation? According to the picture I posted above as well as the video released by abc news it shows something very different.
I didn't know that, I've not followed this as closely as most of you have. I just pick up bits and pieces here and there of what supposedly happened. I don't really follow news stories much. It's pointless these days.
Question. Didn't original reports claim Wilson received a crushed orbital socket in the confrontation? According to the picture I posted above as well as the video released by abc news it shows something very different.
There was, as is infuriatingly almost always the case these days, a lot of misinformation or even outright fabrications made early on. For instance there was a photo of a man, supposedly Wilson, with a severely injured right eye that got into internet circulation. As it turns out it was a picture of motocross biker Jim McNeil. It's finally been cleared up that while Wilson was taken to the hospital for facial injuries x-rays were negative.
A Missouri grand jury did not reach a decision Friday on whether to indict Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson in the shooting of unarmed teenager Michael Brown.
Federal and local law enforcement officials told CNN Saturday.
