It would appear that several readers are incapable of recognizing the following clearly visible qualifying remarks:
(1) If Butch Jones achieves the kind of long-term success that we all hope for and Dobbs can avoid serious injury, Josh will be remembered as . . .
(2) It is highly unlikely, but Josh could potentially challenge that record . . .
(3) [N]obody is predicting All-American honors or Heisman Trophy finalist status for Dobbs, so please refrain from . . .
(4) I suspect that Butch would prefer that his quarterback not carry the ball twenty times a game against an SEC schedule and it should be possible to reduce the positions workload as . . .
(5) f Josh remains healthy, continues to flourish in this offense and accelerates Tennessees return to prominence . . .
(6) If Josh can develop an ability to intellectually dissect opposing defenses comparable to Peytons . . .
Such measured comments should convey to the careful reader that this post is exactly what it purports to be, i.e. factually based speculation on the nature of Dobbs legacy if a number of specific variables, all of which are identified above, come to pass. This is not an exercise in hyperbole. Furthermore, I did not say that Dobbs would revolutionize the quarterback position, only that he may redefine it vis-à-vis the manner in which it has historically been played at Tennessee. Yes, we have had a number of mobile quarterbacks in the past, most notably Holloway, Streater, Robinson, Shuler, and Martin. With the exception of Streater, however, none of them ran the ball with a frequency that remotely approaches the pace Dobbs is on.