#JuanVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
- Messages
- 2,311
- Likes
- 4,498
I've heard that game mentioned a lot. What happened in it?
Wait, you mean like when the refs gave Florida two field goals/point afters clearly after the time ran out on two different games including our own?
All I know is CBJ was decidedly NOT happy about the officiating last night. Given the Alabama late substitutions that happened several times last night beginning with the first play from scrimage, it does make one wonder.
Of course they are. For instance, if Alabama is the top team in the S.E.C. & in the nation and they are playing Vandy. The game is close for some reason. The S.E.C. does not want Alabama to be in a situation to lose to Vandy and lose the # 1 ranking in the nation. So, if a questionable call presents itself, then Alabama will get the call.
A top team in the nation is the S.E.C.'s cash cow so of course they will protect it.
For instance, remember in 2004 when we were playing Auburn in the S.E.C. Championship game? Both Houston & Riggs got long, long runs for T.D.'s but the ref's called both of those t.d.'s back. With those t.d.'s, we win the game & the S.E.C. Championship.
That is just one instance that comes to mind.
Couple things:
I really think this comes down to money. Slive knows if we're not careful the SEC will eat itself because of the level of competition. Any team with 2 losses will not make the playoff and that could easily happen in the SEC. There are millions of $$$ to be lost. While it is very conspiratorial, I think it's very easy to see why some teams could be "protected" by the SEC refs. And, it's obvious that it's happening.
I was at the game Saturday night. Everyone in the stands knew something was up. There is no way it takes that long to call a late hit on UT. Even in the upper deck we could see they were talking with someone on a headset.
The ball placement vs. bama was horrible. We easily lost 3 first downs because of bad ball placement by the refs. I think this may be the sneakiest way the refs have to screw a team. You kill a couple critical drives in a game and you don't have to make bad calls, the team doesn't have a chance.
While Butch is really good about not dissing the refs in press conferences, etc., I'm betting by this point they're probably sick of him. Why? Because every time he chews them out in a game, he's freakin right. He really does make them look inept. He had to remind them of the clock runoff rule at the end of the 1st half of the uf game.
I think everyone agrees we were probably overmatched and had little chance of winning Saturday night, but the reffing problems were glaring and obvious. And, it appears, things are getting worse as the season progresses. I think everyone agrees if we had a decent reffing crew we win the uf game. Which changes the entire complexion of our season and uf's. At this point, I think it is not out of the realm of possibility that the SEC refs would protect a team like bama, who could go to the playoffs and make millions for the SEC, over an unranked opponent like us.
Or, the refs could just be that bad. I'm not sure which scenario is worse.
Watch this and then explain the process to us.This has been explained A MILLION FREAKING TIMES..
The official in change of the play clock is looking at the clock and at zero he looks at the snap. If the snap has not occurred it is delay of game. If the snap is in process or has already been snapped obviously no penalty. That is how it is done...
Watch this and then explain the process to us.
Clear evidence of officials repeatedly getting Penn State-Ohio State calls wrong - SBNation.com
I suspect they flagged it for a punch, before ejecting our guy talked to replay official (which they technically aren't allowed to) I think it is great that they bent the rule before making a call that would have cost a player the rest of the game.
Refs announce player ejections over the PA system. The TV broadcast didn't include that, and the announcers made no mention of it. No article I've seen has mentioned a player being ejected.
So what are you basing your suspicion on?
And even if you're right, you think it's great that the refs didn't follow the rules? That is a door you're opening that you can't close. If they can do it once, they can do it all the time. Slippery slope, and all that.
In fairness the UK one was so close that the ref probably was looking at ball, looked at clock and saw 0, then by the time he looked right back down it was just snapped about qb almost had it.
The SEC headquarters has resided in Birmingham, AL for far too long. All the other schools, including Auburn, would agree that a bias towards the Alabama Crimson Tide has long existed. They are their flagship standard. Officiating and rules come from their office. I have no preference for what state it is relocated to. It simply needs to be moved.
. . . how come we don't have any female referees?
I had this little gem come into my inbox earlier tonight:
Mike Pereira criticizes SEC officiating, calls for investigatwion by Mike Slive and Rogers Redding
I've not bought into the conspiracy theorists out there who claim that the refs are instructed to preserve certain teams, but given the number of suspect calls this year for multiple teams in the conference there does need to be an external review and, if necessary, investigation.
I've a friend who officiates for the ACC. He says that the consensus among conference officiating crews is that SEC refs are a joke. I asked him point blank if he thought they were crooked and he declined to answer.
I look forward to seeing where this conversation goes.
