UTFootballFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 1,412
- Likes
- 787
Not you really but there are those who lean on the injury excuse very heavily... but EVERYONE has injuries and most of them hurt team effectiveness unless you are Bama. They may be the only team that can go two deep everywhere and sometimes 3 without a drop off.I don't necessarily disagree with you on next season but a lot of variables will come into play such as injuries as a prime example. Can't say how next season plays out until next season though.
However, the key point of the your response is the UT AD.
If Hart can point to six wins, the threshold needed for a bowl game next season along with continued strong recruiting and minimal off field issues, I see no way Jones doesn't get to year 4.
I keep hearing people say this, but really don't hold much water. CBJ is a mid major coach from that same conference as Bajakian. Do you really think CBJ doesn't have anything to do with the OL or any of the play calling? Many either don't know or seem to forget that he was a OC at 2 different schools for 7 years. To point all fingers at Bajakian and turn a blind eye to Butch is denial of the truth.Coach's are only as good as the guys they surround themselves with. Butch is a very good Coach, he has the right Coach's on the defensive side of the ball but needs a major upgrade at OC, QB Coach and Oline Coach. We are very good at WR and RB Coach as well. But Bajakian is out of his league as OC, QB Coach at UT. He is a midmajor type OC, not the best conference in college football OC. And not so sure on the Oline Coach either. We have a Beast recruiter in Jones as well in Martinez, Thig and ZA in particular. We have some really good recruiters but need that OC and Oline Coach that also are not only good recruiters but that can develop players and be a good playcaller.
What exactly is the answer until the young guys get more experience and the promising new recruits get on campus? Do you think lack of talent and experience can just be schemed away by a coach? If that was realistic, no coach would put much emphasis on recruiting.
Football is not just a chess match. The pieces have to be able to perform and outperform the other coach's pieces.
I think the folks the OP is referring to need to remember that after Dooley was fired, none of the "big name" coaches that were approached by UT wanted the job. And, the one that thought about taking it was nearly on the plane headed to Knoxville then turned it down in the 11th hour. Those coaches understood how decimated this program was, how difficult it is to win consistently in the SEC, and the expectations of the high-dollar donors & fan base.
That's the reality we live in at the moment. The best thing we can do (even if it's painful) is to give this coach (and whatever staff he's willing to risk his reputation with) the full four years he signed on for. That in itself will aid in the attractiveness of the job if another coaching search were to actually be necessary.
To an extent... yes it can. Kiffin schemed around speed deficiencies in the front 7 on D and OL deficiencies... and QB for that matter. There are MANY examples of coaches doing just that... scheming around weaknesses.What exactly is the answer until the young guys get more experience and the promising new recruits get on campus? Do you think lack of talent and experience can just be schemed away by a coach?
You would rather not have to scheme around weaknesses... that doesn't mean that top shelf coaches can't and don't do it when necessary.If that was realistic, no coach would put much emphasis on recruiting.
No. Not "just" a chess match but one of the keys to being a great coach is covering your weaknesses and exploiting those of your opponent. UT's OL has been exposed for how many weeks now? I won't claim to have all the solutions... but I'm pretty sure that doing the same thing week after week probably isn't it.Football is not just a chess match. The pieces have to be able to perform and outperform the other coach's pieces.
I have seen substantial improvement with Worley this year over last year, especially seeing as how he has no protection from the O-line. The same can happen with Peterman and/or Dobbs next year. I am a little more concerned with the O-line, as I think it would be good to have 1 or 2 more quality recruits, but there are a couple of guys (Blair, Moseley) who are not playing this year who may help out next year. And yes, Butch is highly paid, so he should not be immune to criticism, but the criticism is often due to unrealistic expectations, especially considering the lack of experience and depth on the team (for example, missing the 2 guys mentioned above).
IMHO, every situation is different. Depends on the talent at your disposal. Gus Malzahn takes Gene Chizik's players to the national championship game in no time flat. I'm pretty sure Butch didn't have that luxury. No need to talk regime change for at least 2 more years. If Butch can get it done, it could be good for a long time. Patience.
To an extent... yes it can. Kiffin schemed around speed deficiencies in the front 7 on D and OL deficiencies... and QB for that matter. There are MANY examples of coaches doing just that... scheming around weaknesses.
You would rather not have to scheme around weaknesses... that doesn't mean that top shelf coaches can't and don't do it when necessary.
No. Not "just" a chess match but one of the keys to being a great coach is covering your weaknesses and exploiting those of your opponent. UT's OL has been exposed for how many weeks now? I won't claim to have all the solutions... but I'm pretty sure that doing the same thing week after week probably isn't it.
And for the millionth time.... Freeze inherited a very similar situation at Ole Miss and has them competing for the toughest division in CFB... and maybe of all time in CFB. He improved wins immediately even while recruiting and developing players. Saban is Saban but he didn't inherit a great situation at Bama.
I think Stoops and UK are an illusion for the most part... but they did beat USCe in his 2nd year and he has nowhere near as much talent as Jones has. Oh, interestingly enough, they're starting a Sr, 2 Jrs, a RS Fr, and a Soph on their OL... Three upperclassmen... just like UT. Two young players.... and Jones DID have the option for his two young guys to be 2nd year players.
Go look at the threads on this site where people are whining and comparing UT to some of the top ranked teams in the country.
By the way, when is just a bowl game enough?
He won 9 games in year two at a program that had had 1 winning season in the previous 9. They didn't have to be too patient. He gave them reason to hope almost right away.You make a good point, but then I look at Mississippi State. Patience paid off.
I think the first point where you really sit and consider that is after next season at the earliest. The wins between now and then should be the evaluation tool.Again, every situation is different. Don't get me wrong: there clearly comes a time to pull the plug. I don't think we are close to that point yet. We'll know it when/if we get there.
I can agree to an extent on Worley.
I am still disappointed with his decision making but he has proven without a doubt his resiliency and the accuracy when he has had time has improved.
Agree on the criticism from unrealistic expectations as well. I don't think anyone with any common sense expected a championship run this season.
However, the head coach himself expected a bowl to start the season and that appears to be slipping away.
"I want to continue to stay positive and move forward, but its expected that we go to bowl games from here on out. Thats our goal."
Plenty of season left but I don't like our chances much if Worley is indeed out for an extended period.
IMHO, every situation is different. Depends on the talent at your disposal. Gus Malzahn takes Gene Chizik's players to the national championship game in no time flat. I'm pretty sure Butch didn't have that luxury. No need to talk regime change for at least 2 more years. If Butch can get it done, it could be good for a long time. Patience.
To further your point, Gus Malzahn had the advantage of having actually recruited most of Chisik's players to fit his system when he was the coordinator at Auburn. He knew exactly what players he was getting and had already been involved in coaching them long before he was ever the head coach. Anyone who doesn't think the reason for Chisik's success are very short sighted. Think Fulmer and Cutcliff.