Muslims behead yet another person

#576
#576
If ISIS trying to instigate a full on Western response, to ignite a west vs Islam war, they might just get their way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#577
#577
lawgator1 said:
If ISIS trying to instigate a full on Western response, to ignite a west vs Islam war, they might just get their way.
Click to expand...

Even AQ during the 2000s didn't unite the international community as much as IS seems to be doing.
 
#578
#578
Burhead said:
Even AQ during the 2000s didn't unite the international community as much as IS seems to be doing.
Click to expand...


It seems to be their goal to cause WW III. Not US versus USSR (or remnants thereof), but instead US v. Islamic extremists.

Thing is, you can't carpet bomb one of their cities, because they don't have them. They have houses within neighborhoods within cities. Very difficult problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#581
#581
lawgator1 said:
It seems to be their goal to cause WW III. Not US versus USSR (or remnants thereof), but instead US v. Islamic extremists.

Thing is, you can't carpet bomb one of their cities, because they don't have them. They have houses within neighborhoods within cities. Very difficult problem.
Click to expand...

It's exactly what they want. In their mind it's a win/win.
 
#586
#586
FLVOL69 said:
Iran is working ot on it. And you're right, if they had it they'd use it.0
Click to expand...

No they wouldn't just like North Korea hasn't. The regime leaders are not willing to sacrifice their power and wealth to give a nuke to terrorists that could easily be traced back to them. MAD would still work even if Tehran achieved nuclear status.
 
#587
#587
lawgator1 said:
It seems to be their goal to cause WW III. Not US versus USSR (or remnants thereof), but instead US v. Islamic extremists.

Thing is, you can't carpet bomb one of their cities, because they don't have them. They have houses within neighborhoods within cities. Very difficult problem.
Click to expand...

Collateral damage, Too bad. You can bet they'll be collateral damage "again"in the US if they get their wish
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#589
#589
Burhead said:
No they wouldn't just like North Korea hasn't. The regime leaders are not willing to sacrifice their power and wealth to give a nuke to terrorists that could easily be traced back to them. MAD would still work even if Tehran achieved nuclear status.
Click to expand...

Apples and oranges, these religious fanatics believe this is what will bring on the return of the 12th Imam. I wouldn't bet my life on it.
 
#590
#590
FLVOL69 said:
Poor attempt at humor, I could give a rats ass what color they are..Terrorists are like fire ants and should be treated as such.
Click to expand...

If anyone would recognize a poor attempt...

The terrorist threat to the average American is way overblown. Maybe if we weren't arming these groups at the request of the Saudis the ME wouldn't be dealing with these psychos.

Also anyone accepting civilian casualties to deal with something like this is useless and should instead work on finally getting that ged
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#592
#592
This should serve as a lesson to journalists..if a Middle Eastern dictatorship wants to oppress its people and wage an bloody civil war..just let them. There is no need to try and "expose the suffering" because most of us..don't care. It's not worth losing your head over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#593
#593
utvolpj said:
If anyone would recognize a poor attempt...

The terrorist threat to the average American is way overblown. Maybe if we weren't arming these groups at the request of the Saudis the ME wouldn't be dealing with these psychos.

Also anyone accepting civilian casualties to deal with something like this is useless and should instead work on finally getting that ged
Click to expand...

I'll start worrying about their civilian casualties when they start worrying about ours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#595
#595
utvolpj said:
If anyone would recognize a poor attempt...

The terrorist threat to the average American is way overblown. Maybe if we weren't arming these groups at the request of the Saudis the ME wouldn't be dealing with these psychos.

Also anyone accepting civilian casualties to deal with something like this is useless and should instead work on finally getting that ged
Click to expand...


In that case you had better start studying, I pity your kids, that is if you're even allowed to procreate in your state. Go right ahead and stick your head back in the sand where it belongs. If our government had that point of view in the 40's we'd all be speaking German.
 
#596
#596
utvolpj said:
How many has Isis caused in the US ?
Click to expand...

None to my knowledge but they just killed two of ours over there, what's the difference?

According to some a civilian is a civilian even if they put themselves or stay in dangerous situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#597
#597
hog88 said:
None to my knowledge but they just killed two of ours over there, what's the difference?

According to some a civilian is a civilian even if they put themselves or stay in dangerous situations.
Click to expand...

He won't take a stance till one of his kinfolk gets murdered..
 
#598
#598
FLVOL69 said:
In that case you had better start studying, I pity your kids, that is if you're even allowed to procreate in your state. Go right ahead and stick your head back in the sand where it belongs. If our government had that point of view in the 40's we'd all be speaking German.
Click to expand...

You're taking a shot at my kids now? You sure know how to keep it classy even when you have nothing to ever add to any discussion
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#599
#599
hog88 said:
None to my knowledge but they just killed two of ours over there, what's the difference?

According to some a civilian is a civilian even if they put themselves or stay in dangerous situations.
Click to expand...

Two who decided to take the risk and venture into a war zone. Personal responsibility is a tough thing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#600
#600
utvolpj said:
Two who decided to take the risk and venture into a war zone. Personal responsibility is a tough thing
Click to expand...

Goes both ways bubba, there are many "civilians" who choose to stay and keep their families in war zones. Guess you believe those reporters deserved what they got?

Your correct personal responsibility is a tough thing.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top