Unfortunately flying CAS, even with modern munitions, is still a dangerous arena. Especially in a place like Afghanistan where missions are often flown danger close.
Great strides in recent years have been able to help with the Blue on Blue casualties, but things like this will still happen.
So the SAS is better than our rangers,seals,force recon,etc?
I just watched "lone survivor" and I must say, navy seals are some bad ass dudes. I can't imagine there being any person tougher/stronger than that.
Would you stop being some damn reserved and tentative and give me the info I need?
So what branch were you in? And in what capacity did you serve? What years did you serve?
I'm intrigued by these things. And I would love to know.
I'll hang up and listen.
Is that the show were they compete against one another in various heats? Or is it the one were they have to do survivor ****, whatever the hell that means?
So the SAS is better than our rangers,seals,force recon,etc?
I just watched "lone survivor" and I must say, navy seals are some bad ass dudes. I can't imagine there being any person tougher/stronger than that.
So the SAS is better than our rangers,seals,force recon,etc?
I just watched "lone survivor" and I must say, navy seals are some bad ass dudes. I can't imagine there being any person tougher/stronger than that.
Not better per se so to speak. Different mission. Comparable to Delta Force (as Delta was patterned on the 22nd) and really are about on par with each other.
Rangers are shock infantry. Highly trained and specialized shock infantry and damn good, but not really comparable in mission to the SAS.
SEALs are the maritime equivalent to the Special Forces.
Force Recon are highly trained Marines that go deep into enemy territory and scope out high value targets. They can strike at them as well if needed.
The biggest things about most of your units around the world classified as "Special Operations Forces" is the fact that they may be good in one arena, but completely excel in another. Your line Army Special Forces ODA teams are great as trainers and shooters, but aren't as good in the hostage rescue position. While Delta Force is at the top of the game in that situation as that's what they specialize in.
AAR?
Looking for keywords for google
Are you a vet, Ron? I've sensed as much over your last few posts in this thread, yet you've not stated it explicitly.
Interesting. So while they ( our special forces divisions) are all good, they are trained to excel in certain areas more so than others?
Who would you think are our most well versed special forces? The most well rounded.
Basically, they were ambushed by 10-15, maybe 20 dudes. Still a ****ty situation for four men, and one that will usually lead to the annihilation of all four, but they certainly did not take on 100-200 dudes, killing most of them.
Murphys MoH citation, which is also an exaggeration of the enemy forces, only reads 50 enemy. Again, well shy of the at least 80 but likely over 100 that Marcus claims in his book.
I spent 6 months as a part time National Guard cook and another 3 months as the 2nd in command of the base library. That Corporal I worked under was a hammer. After those 9 months I got a discharge for PTSD.
Most well-rounded? If we are including training foreign nationals and holding their own in most any mission given them, ODA (Green Berets).
CAG (Delta) is amazing, but also highly secretive and not always officially and explicitly recognized. Then there are the units like VMG that are absolutely secret squirrel.
Most well-rounded? If we are including training foreign nationals and holding their own in most any mission given them, ODA (Green Berets).
CAG (Delta) is amazing, but also highly secretive and not always officially and explicitly recognized. Then there are the units like VMG that are absolutely secret squirrel.
Interesting. So while they ( our special forces divisions) are all good, they are trained to excel in certain areas more so than others?
Who would you think are our most well versed special forces? The most well rounded.
