- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 75,940
- Likes
- 105,133
Seems a little harsh. Being in the Army while Clinton was POTUS, by your standards, 75% would have been considered a disgrace.
Being in the USAF at the same time, I'll disagree. We certainly didn't like him, but damned if we put such things out in public. It's called discipline and respect for the position.
You may have had a different experience, and I won't disount your reality.
Possibly variants in branches of the service or even divisions in my case. But I can tell you there was little to no Clinton love to be found.
Not worth arguing over, but I'll not shame Carlos for expressing himself in a forum.
Big difference in not liking him (that was widespread) and respecting the position enough to not make our feelings public. Oh, sure, we discussed things over a beer about how we didn't care for him...or Hillary even that far back, but never did we get giddy over his possible demise as POTUS.
Call me old school, but if you wear a uniform, you keep your ****ing mouth shut when it comes to bashing your CinC even when you are hiding behind a computer.
Being in the USAF at the same time, I'll disagree. We certainly didn't like him, but damned if we put such things out in public. It's called discipline and respect for the position.
subpoena her assNellie Ohr refuses to testify before House panel
Waiting for Chuck Schumer's "What are they hiding!, What are they hiding" comments.
what is she hiding! AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH. She's guilty!!!! Innocent people demand to be investigated.
Sorry, got this confused with Kavanaugh situation.
You got it backwards. No one says if you're innocent you demand an investigation. The conditional runs the other way--if you're demanding that someone investigate your claims, then you're likely being honest. It does not follow that if you're not demanding an investigation you must have something to hide.
You got it backwards. No one says if you're innocent you demand an investigation. The conditional runs the other way--if you're demanding that someone investigate your claims, then you're likely being honest. It does not follow that if you're not demanding an investigation you must have something to hide.