The military vote.

[DinkinFlicka]

Didn't show up? The first debate was about the economy and his actually trying to debate would have been worse. His record there is pathetic, but makes his viewpoint look brilliant. GTFO with this stupidity about Obama not showing. Hes an economics 11 year old.

I guess just about everyone covering, reporting, studying, and analyzing the debates are wrong and you are right.

Not saying he's a good economist... but he was out of it that night. Kind of like McCain in the town hall debate in '08. I'm surprised chestnut cheeks managed to find the place that night.

 

[gsvol]

Gs, that was actually a pretty funny article. Well played

Glad to see you appreciate the humor, evidently you aren't the humorless snit you usually appear to be.

For any satire to work there must be an element of truth to it.

So much weird stuff has gone on in the last two months, there is more than enough material for a Tom Clancy novel.

Pundit Press: Fraud in PA: Obama Got Over 99% of Vote at Polls Where GOP Inspectors were Removed; Turnout Somehow "30%" Above Gov't Numbers

Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally) removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Mr. Obama received "astronomical" numbers in those very same regions, including locations where he received "over 99%" of the vote.

Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Mr. Obama received 99.5% of the vote, defeating Mr. Romney 9,955 to 55.
------------------

Another problem: "Voter turnout in Philadelphia was around 60 percent, according to state election figures." In these precincts it was well over 90%.


Clear fraud, odd percentages, and numbers that don't add up? Congratulations on your re-election, Mr. Obama.

Plus this:
How many times did you vote? - The Tinderbox -

and this: PT | Phish | How many times did you vote so far?

and this:How many times did you vote for your candidate? | SpaceBattles.com

Reaganite Republican: FUN FACT: Obama Lost in Every State with a Voter Photo-ID Law

Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20).

This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs.

Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

 

[bluetickhound16]

Is that an Onion article? That's funny stuff wherever it came from. I can just see folks copy pasting that to their FB pages right now...

 

[emainvol]

The states that require photo ID are all pretty red (Indiana somehow went blue last election, which still puzzles me), I don't think there is much to be read into that.

 

[emainvol]

Also, fraud or not, that post fails to mention that McCain only received 60 votes in the Fourth Ward in 08. 55 votes is certainly not an outside possibility. Not sure on Obama's numbers from 08 there, but that is from the philly.com article linked in that post.

 

[BigPapaVol]

I guess just about everyone covering, reporting, studying, and analyzing the debates are wrong and you are right.

Not saying he's a good economist... but he was out of it that night. Kind of like McCain in the town hall debate in '08. I'm surprised chestnut cheeks managed to find the place that night.

what could Obama have said that made his record or viewpoint salvageable. He was best served to be mute rather than look retarded.

I think your invoking "everyone" being on your side is great way to debate. It's wrong and stupid as hell, but it's great for those who buy it. Had you said something about talking heads on about 90% of the media outlets support you, then you'd look less absurd.

 

[emainvol]

Also, the closest state out of those listed as "closely contested" with no voter ID laws was Colorado, which was still something like +4.5 Obama. The rest were all +5 to +10. That is hardly closely contested.

Hell, North Carolina has no voter ID requirement and it was closer than all of them. It also went Romney

 

[DinkinFlicka]

what could Obama have said that made his record or viewpoint salvageable. He was best served to be mute rather than look retarded.

I think your invoking "everyone" being on your side is great way to debate. It's wrong and stupid as hell, but it's great for those who buy it. Had you said something about talking heads on about 90% of the media outlets support you, then you'd look less absurd.

So you really think his dazed, convoluted rambling was BETTER than his usual economic talking points that really weren't better or worse than Mitt's? Such a compelling argument. It's really infallible.

I think dropping the "absurd" card is a fantastic way to debate, to be honest. I can see why you use it every three posts. Again, infallible. For the record, I was referring to those talking heads. Therefore, I must be "less absurd." Whoopty ****ing doo.

Was the economy the most important issue in the election? You think he was dazed every time he gave a speech outlining his plan for the economy? YOU might believe that delivering his premeditated spiel would have hurt him more than going out there looking completely lost, and that is absolutely fine. However, don't drop the "I'm right and you are so so wrong" card and expect your opinion to look well-substantiated for going against the grain.

And to answer your question, it doesn't matter. He won the election despite the economy being priority #1 in said election.

 

[BigPapaVol]

So you really think his dazed, convoluted rambling was BETTER than his usual economic talking points that really weren't better or worse than Mitt's? Such a compelling argument. It's really infallible.

I think dropping the "absurd" card is a fantastic way to debate, to be honest. I can see why you use it every three posts. Again, infallible.

Was the economy the most important issue in the election? You think he was dazed every time he gave a speech outlining his plan for the economy? YOU might believe that delivering his premeditated spiel would have hurt him more than going out there looking completely lost, and that is absolutely fine. However, don't drop the "I'm right and you are so so wrong" card and expect your opinion to look well-substantiated for going against the grain.

And to answer your question, it doesn't matter. He won the election despite the economy being priority #1 in said election.

don't be so dense. His talking points on the economy were platitudes that only work in a vacuum. With someone on the other side of the fence to talk back regarding economics, the guy is an utter idiot. His approach of saying nothing that could be debated was the right one.

How in the hell is it not senseless to talk about a guy whose lone strength is oratory skill going out and just lying down on what everyone believed to be the single most important topic in the entire election? Can you even begin to make an argument that is anything but mealy mouthed journalist speak to try and justify it? Seriously, an off night? How many off nights on the most important stages work for you?

Are you seriously trying to debate that his talking points, in light of his track record, in an open forum against a guy who can run financial circles around him was going to be a wash? You believe that was going to turn out better than the dumbassery about an "off night" that you're peddling here? GTFO.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

don't be so dense. His talking points on the economy were platitudes that only work in a vacuum. With someone on the other side of the fence to talk back regarding economics, the guy is an utter idiot. His approach of saying nothing that could be debated was the right one.

How in the hell is it not senseless to talk about a guy whose lone strength is oratory skill going out and just lying down on what everyone believed to be the single most important topic in the entire election? Can you even begin to make an argument that is anything but mealy mouthed journalist speak to try and justify it? Seriously, an off night? How many off nights on the most important stages work for you?

Are you seriously trying to debate that his talking points, in light of his track record, in an open forum against a guy who can run financial circles around him was going to be a wash? You believe that was going to turn out better than the dumbassery about an "off night" that you're peddling here? GTFO.

Let's take a 3 minute trip to whatever planet you're posting from right now. He's nothing more than a speaker? Well, he did a **** job of speaking that night. The Obama supporters that were watching the debate with us were pulling their hair out. It's not as though Mitt came across as any sort of genius. He said his fair share of bull**** that was contestable.... just like he did in the debates following the first. You're out of your damned mind if you think Mitt Romney had an impenetrable economic argument. Hell, Obama managed to call him out on it in the final debate when they began digressing from the foreign policy crap... which is pathetic on Mitt's part... deeply pathetic.

To answer one of your dozen questions (which virtually answers all of them, oddly enough): his ****ty talking points were convincing enough to the average American voter. You cannot contest that. The proof is in the pudding, cochise. It made him look more hollow than his talking points are to simply lay on his belly and take it.

I know you like to come here to fight, and I do too. Seriously, what are we arguing about? Obama's debate performance in an election that's already over? You're really spouting off your precious critical thinking abilities over this? You, sir, must get the **** out of here with that. You're not even arguing for the sake of arguing. You're arguing for the sake of coming across as argumentative, hahahaha.

 

[BEATBAMA12]

No one in Mississippi has a photo id , they just show their tattoos .

 

[BigPapaVol]

Let's take a 3 minute trip to whatever planet you're posting from right now. He's nothing more than a speaker? Well, he did a **** job of speaking that night. The Obama supporters that were watching the debate with us were pulling their hair out. It's not as though Mitt came across as any sort of genius. He said his fair share of bull**** that was contestable.... just like he did in the debates following the first. You're out of your damned mind if you think Mitt Romney had an impenetrable economic argument. Hell, Obama managed to call him out on it in the final debate when they began digressing from the foreign policy crap... which is pathetic on Mitt's part... deeply pathetic.

To answer one of your dozen questions (which virtually answers all of them, oddly enough): his ****ty talking points were convincing enough to the average American voter. You cannot contest that. The proof is in the pudding, cochise. It made him look more hollow than his talking points are to simply lay on his belly and take it.

I know you like to come here to fight, and I do too. Seriously, what are we arguing about? Obama's debate performance in an election that's already over? You're really spouting off your precious critical thinking abilities over this? You, sir, must get the **** out of here with that. You're not even arguing for the sake of arguing. You're arguing for the sake of coming across as argumentative, hahahaha.

You're answer to all of mine wasn't an answer. It's THE problem. Inmates running the asylum isn't proof that inmates are brilliant. It's proof that inmates would prefer to have supportive rule makers. America having again voted the free cheese crowd into leadership has been generations in the making. It isn't validation that Obama knows a single thing about the long term viability of our economy. The proof is in the expanding debt, and not the electorate. I assumed you had more sense.

You're speaking from the view of the broader media and forgetting that it hasn't the first inkling of objectivity. Arguing against talking points made to be voter friendly is absurd. Your trying to refute those points will be entertaining. Hint: if you take the greater media clueless approach, you'll look like you do now - sheepish.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

You're answer to all of mine wasn't an answer. It's THE problem. Inmates running the asylum isn't proof that inmates are brilliant. It's proof that inmates would prefer to have supportive rule makers. America having again voted the free cheese crowd into leadership has been generations in the making. It isn't validation that Obama knows a single thing about the long term viability of our economy. The proof is in the expanding debt, and not the electorate. I assumed you had more sense.

You're speaking from the view of the broader media and forgetting that it hasn't the first inkling of objectivity. Arguing against talking points made to be voter friendly is absurd. Your trying to refute those points will be entertaining. Hint: if you take the greater media clueless approach, you'll look like you do now - sheepish.

Last I checked, I've been saying his talking points were better than looking hopped up on Fentanyl and tripping over his own words... like the first debate. See there?


Did I once say that he knows a single thing about the economy? No. Never. Not once. You, sir, put words in my mouth and accused me of aligning myself with the media.

I've no desire to refute those points, so I'm sorry you won't get your entertainment (I know it's probably like blue balling you at this point... sheesh). You have to get elected before you can rule... any idiot knows that.

Your opinion happens to be in step with the same folks who cite blogs and FNC as the source of sources. I'm of the belief that the GOP's problem is that it has made itself un-electable because it A) targets a fading demographic and B) its social policies are stuck in the 50's, which prevents picking up a lot new voters. You and your pathetic constituencies seem to think it's because this country digs handouts, which would mean that over 50% of it is on welfare. Gee, BPV, that sounds... absurd.

Don't call me a sheep when your post is difficult to read over all the bleating.

 

[gsvol]

Lame president + terrible initial debate showing = close race.

Voter apathy (47% of the electorate didn't vote) and significant democrat socialist voting fraud are the two main contributing factors that allow Obama to continue.

Pundit Press: What Luck! Obama Won Dozens of Cleveland Districts with 100% of the Vote

Obama must have run a great campaign considering the tremendous numbers he put up in numerous big cities. Over in Philadelphia, he was lucky enough to get 90% percent turnout in some districts with over 99% of the vote.

In Cleveland, in some districts he did even better with an astounding 100% of the vote in dozens of locations. For example, in Cleveland's Fifth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts E, F, and G 1,337 to Mitt Romney's... 0. And in case you're wondering, Gary Johnson received more votes than Mr. Romney.

Well, maybe that's just a fluke. In the Ninth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts D-G with a paltry total of 1,740 to... 3. Hey, at least Romney got .2% of the vote!

And in case you're wondering, Gary Johnson tied or received more votes than Mr. Romney in both of those districts.

Okay, what if we look at an entire Ward? No way this trend continues, right? An entire ward. Why not do the First Ward? Obama won that one 12,857 to... 94. This time Romney got .7% of the vote. He's moving up in the world!

In total, there are 21 districts in Cleveland where Mr. Romney received precisely 0 votes. In 23 districts, he received precisely 1 vote.

But Ohio's not important in the electoral college, right?

Pundit Press: Good News: Obama Won County in Ohio with 108% Voter Registration

I can't believe President Obama's luck. First, he received over 99% of the vote in districts where GOP inspectors were illegally removed. Next, he won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland. Well, he's gotten another lucky break!

Mr. Obama won Wood County in Ohio this year. That's right, Mr. Obama won the majority of Wood County's 108% of registered voters. That's not a typo.

In 2012, 106,258 people in Wood County are registered to vote out of an eligible 98,213. But it certainly must all be a coincidence, right?

Democrat Daniel Gordon, First Ward Council Member, remarked at how well the President had done this election cycle. “There has never been a more efficient and powerful ground game in American politics,” he said. “I think this is a win for the American people, and I’m very proud of all the young people who poured their hearts out into this.”

And secretary of College Democrats Morgan Holliger chimed in, “We won Wood County, we won Ohio.”

Mr. Obama did indeed win Wood County, along with its 108% of voters.

 

[gsvol]

Colorado Counties Have More Voters Than People | Media Trackers Colorado

A review of voter registration data for ten counties in

Colorado details a pattern of voter bloat inflating registration rolls to numbers larger than the total voting age population. Using publicly available voter data and comparing it to U.S. Census records reveals the ten counties having a total registration ranging between 104 to 140 percent of the respective populations.

Counties such as Gilpin and Hinsdale have 110 percent of their populations registered to vote. Gilpin County has a total population of 5,441 with 17.4% of the population below the voting age, making the highest possible number of registered voters 4,494. Currently Gilpin County has 4909 registered voters. Hinsdale County has a total population of 830 with 20% of the population below the voting age, making the highest possible number of registered voters 664. At 110 percent registration, that means that there are 515 excess voter registrations in Gilpin county and 68 excess registrations for Hinsdale.


When Media Trackers requested comment on the voter bloat in Gilpin county, Chief Deputy Gail Maxwell explained that “This is just a reminder Gilpin is a Gaming Community. The voters come and go!”

While these voters come and go, they manage to turnout to vote. Records show Gilpin County had 61 percent voter turnout in the 2010 election and Hinsdale County had an astounding 92 percent voter turnout. This is far above the Colorado average turnout of 48 percent, and the national average of 41 percent.

All ten counties investigated by Media Trackers reported voter turnout greater than the national average. Nine out of ten also showed voter turnout well above the Colorado average. Mineral and San Juan counties, which have voter registration numbers of 126 percent and 112 percent respectively, had voter turnout of 96 and 83 percent respectively.

Jackson, Summit, Cheyenne, and Elbert counties have 111, 107, 105, and 104 percent of their population registered to vote, while managing 71, 44, 71, and 63 percent voter turnout.

Rounding out the ten counties looked at by Media Trackers are San Miguel county, which topped the list at 140 percent of the population being registered to vote and 52 percent voter turnout, and Ouray county, which had 119 percent of the population registered to vote and a whopping 74 percent voter turnout.

While Ouray County has a total population of 4,356, with 17.8 percent of the population below the voting age, the county has 4,246 people registered to vote. The highest possible number of voting age residents in the county is 3,581, which is 775 less than the actual registered total.

San Miguel County has a total population of 7,359 with 19.2 percent of the population below the voting age, making the highest possible number of registered voters 5,946. If the census numbers are to be trusted, that results in the possibility of up to 2,390 individuals on the voter rolls who should not be.
-------------------------------

In a separate analysis done by the Franklin Center, it was found that seventeen of Colorado’s sixty four counties have registration greater than 100 percent of the US Census voting age population.

Anyone starting to see a pattern yet?

 

[emainvol]

Colorado Counties Have More Voters Than People | Media Trackers Colorado

A review of voter registration data for ten counties in

Anyone starting to see a pattern yet?

Extremely important question, are those numbers based on master registration rolls? If they are, there is your explanation.

 

[emainvol]

Extremely important question, are those numbers based on master registration rolls? If they are, there is your explanation.

All of those numbers assume the census numbers are correct, as well. And if you guys don't trust the government to do anything else, I don't understand why you would trust them to get a census right.

 

[gsvol]

Extremely important question, are those numbers based on master registration rolls? If they are, there is your explanation.

So give me more on your explanation.

You're saying this passes your smell test?

Here is another case:

EDITORIAL: Florida's tainted vote - Washington Times

On election night, Mr. West had maintained a district-wide lead of nearly 2,000 votes until the St. Lucie County Supervisor of Elections inexplicably “recounted” thousands of early ballots, resulting in an awfully convenient 4,400-vote shift in favor of the challenger. Observers on the scene charged incompetence, intimidation and possible fraud on the part of local election officials. Mr. West has asked a judge to impound the ballots and order a recount to set things straight.

Lawyers for the West campaign have been overseeing the process at the Riviera Beach vote tabulation center, and they told The Washington Times that they’re concerned about what they have been seeing. Temporary workers are helping the local staff oversee the count of absentee ballots, those damaged by voting machines and ballots in which the three pages have become separated. They are making new ballots to replace the damaged ones, and are required to mark them with the same votes. Florida law allows observers to be present during this process, however, election officials are effectively denying poll watchers an opportunity to keep tabs on what’s going on.

Florida Department of State - Election Results

Only one precinct had less than 113% turnout. 154 registered voters 107 votes 69.48% The Unofficial vote count? 175,554 registered voters 247,713 vote cards cast (141.10% ) Again please note these numbers supposedly do NOT include Provisional ballots. Oh yeah people, Allen West is entirely justified in asking for a lockdown on the ballot boxes and machines, .....

A liberal judge denied a lockdown of boxes and machines with the strange excuse that no results were official yet.

Funny how all these cases are in precincts controled by dhimmiRATS, isn't it?

All of those numbers assume the census numbers are correct, as well. And if you guys don't trust the government to do anything else, I don't understand why you would trust them to get a census right.

Especially with Obama and Acorn running it.

Maybe you have a simple explanation for the following.

THIS COULD BE WHAT... | Facebook

Here is just one account of what happened in a Wisconsin polling place; We saw loads of voters being bused in from Chicago. They were blatant, in your face, wearing BEARS shirts, pants, hats,etc. They were FREELY openly talking about catching buses back to Chicago. VAN loads of these people were followed from the polling place to drop off points in the same geographical area, by THREE different individuals, including Republican Legal representative, and TWO Official trained Project ORCA representatives/poll observers . This area was in the 12th and 13th St. area, between the 1300-1600 blocks.
Many of the Van occupants were then seen entering two addresses there, according to first hand reports.

Ballot counting machine for wards 9 and 10 STOPPED WORKING, and was replaced FOUR separate times, with FOUR different machines throughout the day, the first breakdown occurred at 9:00 a.m..Each time, ALL COLLECTED BALLOTS were REFED into the new machine to produce ultimate results.

Wards 9 & 10 are comprised of a voter count of approximately 1,500 combined. The highest voter turnout in past elections, according to long time poll workers there, had been in the 600 to 650 range. November 2012 voter count was over 1160.

Never before in Sheboygan County history, have ballot counting machines malfunctioned 4 times in the same election, let alone, Four times in the same polling place!!

The counts were absurdly skewed! GOP legal counsel advised Passionate Pachyderm/ ORCA pole watchers to remain at the polling place with the ballots, until such time as they witnessed the ballots being turned over to the proper authorities at the close of the poll.

In wards with only 1500 people, there were more than 120 NEW voters registered, this too is unprecedented.

In district 4, ward 14, at the mead public library, a down town ward with few residents, is mostly business, and is just one block away from the city bus transfer station... Over 200 new voters were registered there. OVER 200!

According to WI numbers, people went into the polls, voted for Democrat Barack Obama, for president, then voted straight REPUBLICAN down the line in nearly every other race. This might be possible in one or two polling places,throughout a state, but is VERY unlikely statewide, or nationwide.

We have photos of these people in vehicles with plates from different states, photos of them leaving the polls, as well as the many other irregularities.
-----------------------------

But Wait! There's MORE! Oh yes, a LOT more.

Hugo would be proud.

With the help of a liberal judge. On March 12, 2012 Wisconsin’s Vote ID law was held unconstitutional by a state judge and due to this was not in effect for the elections.

 

[gsvol]

More:

Pundit Press: In Florida: Obama Got Over 99% in Broward County Precincts

Down in Broward County, Florida, Mr. Obama came away with more votes than he garnered in 2008, a particularly staggering accomplishment considering he received fewer state-wide totals in both Florida and across the country.

How exactly did he accomplish this? Well, in part thanks to Broward County Precincts L024 to L029 (though I'm sure it's all a coincidence that this happened to precincts all in order).

In those precincts combined, all in order, Mr. Obama won over 99% of the vote, defeating Mitt Romney 5,392 to... 54. Golly, how lucky! This especially impressive because in precincts L019-L022 (L023 doesn't exist) Mr. Romney did over 14 times better than in L024-L029, and the precinct after, did 30 times better.

But hey, is Florida that important in the race for the Presidency?

R039, 1028 Obama, 7 Romney and with ZILCH votes for all other seats.

NONE of the 1,028 voters cast a single vote for any seat other than President.

"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."
—Joseph Stalin

Looking at St. Lucie County returns.

The first 36 precincts listed reported a ratio between 121% and 186% votes to registered voters.

 

[gsvol]

military voting | Election Law Blog

The point that must not be forgotten is that the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) failed to provide military voters the assistance required under federal law. The most recent allegations are an attempt to deflect criticism from FVAP’s failures and cloud the real problem of low military voter participation rates.
Contrary to Mr. Carey’s claims, the Military Voter Protection Project (MVP Project) considered whether to include “automatically” generated absentee ballot requests in our analysis of the 2008 election data. Under federal law, as it stood in 2008, states were required to send out absentee ballots to military and overseas voters for two federal election cycles. In other words, if a military voter requested an absentee ballot for the 2006 federal election, the state not only had to send absentee ballots for the 2006 election cycle, it also automatically send absentee ballots for the 2008 federal elections as well.

Federal law subsequently changed in 2009, but we decided to include automatic absentee ballots in our analysis for two reasons. First, they were still valid absentee ballot requests for the 2008 election. Second, a vast majority of these ballots were cast and counted. This latter fact is evidenced by the 2008 post-election report by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), where nearly two-thirds of these ballots were received by the voter and were returned to the local election official to be counted.

For us, it came down to this: if you are trying to gauge the number of potential participants in an election, why would you exclude valid absentee ballot requests, especially when a vast majority of those ballots were returned and counted? Regardless of the source, they represent thousands of real military and overseas voters that participated in the 2008 election. Now, they represent thousands of military and overseas voters that may not be able to participate in the upcoming election.

Nor should anyone buy the false claim that military and overseas voting is actually up in 2012. That claim can only be made by ignoring the 231,000 automatic absentee ballots that were sent out and the 150,000 that were returned to local election officials to be counted. It makes no sense to exclude these ballots unless you were trying to understate actual participation rates in 2008.

If you look at the number of military and overseas ballots that were counted in 2008, it shows you how far we must go in the coming weeks to meet 2008 totals. Take Florida, for example: in 2008, the state counted 95,014 absentee ballots from military and overseas voters. Yet, as of September 22nd, the state had sent only 65,173 absentee ballots to these voters.

The same holds true for Virginia. In 2008, Virginia counted 28,816 military and overseas ballots in the presidential election, but has sent out only 12,292 for this year’s election as of September 22, 2012. It doesn’t take much to figure out that it will be difficult to meet the 2008 participation levels, even if every single ballot is returned and counted.
---------------------------------

FVAP and the Pentagon’s failure to implement this requirement must be the central point in this discussion. If we are going to improve the participation rates by military voters, they need a more systematic process to register and request an absentee ballot.

Until that occurs, our military members will continue to be one of the most disenfranchised groups in the United States.

 

[gsvol]

Not buying.

Everyone except emain whiffed at the satire changeup.

How about you and ha ha boy taking a swing at some of these fastballs?

Photo of Ethiopians brought to Ohio voting stations by busload, 95% of whom did not speak English, and told to vote for Obama, straight Dem ticket https://www.facebook.com/lori.patriot/posts/404694619604138

Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting:
Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting Machines - YouTube

Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers:
Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers - YouTube

How Obama fixed the 2012 election: Michael Savage: How Obama fixed 2012 election - YouTube

Massive voter fraud discovered in April:
Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers - YouTube

Whistle blower speaks out about voter fraud: YouTube feature=player_embedded&v=k_rMpQKqZhM

 

[gsvol]

Not buying.

Do you buy this:?

Fraud: Some told they already voted, others brag about voting multiple times - National Elections | Examiner.com

A number of voters across the country received a bit of a shock when they were told by poll workers on Tuesday they had already voted, even though they hadn't. At the same time, others bragged about voting multiple times on Twitter.

Townhall's Guy Benson reported that a former GOP official was informed that he had already voted when he arrived at his polling place in Alexandria, Virginia.

"I got inside, they set me up, I gave the woman my ID, and I told her my address. She said, 'it seems you've voted absentee.' Then she realized she'd read the sheet wrong. 'No, it says here that you've already voted,' she told me," he said. "I hadn't even applied for an absentee ballot, nor did I vote early. As hokey as it sounds, I was excited to vote in person. I had absolutely not voted earlier that day. I arrived four minutes after they opened. Basically, I was told I'd already voted, but I hadn't."

A report at the Herald-Bulletin said that a “printing glitch” caused voters in Indiana to be turned away after being told the entire precinct voted absentee.

Or this:?

Vote fraud alert: One out of five registered Ohio voters is bogus | Conservative News, Views & Books

Vote fraud is no big deal, right? It hardly ever happens. It’s so rare that it’s not even worth discussing. Anyone who claims to take the integrity of our ballots seriously is cynically exploiting phantom fears for the purpose of suppressing the Democrat-loving minority vote.

To keep that silly narrative alive, it’s important not to read the Sunday edition of the Columbus Dispatch, in which readers were informed that “more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.”

Furthermore, “in two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible.”

31 more counties report over 90 percent voter registration, which is a good 20 percent higher than the national average. The Buckeye State sure is civic-minded! Well, except that 1.6 million of the 7.8 million registered voters in the state haven’t voted in at least four years. So I guess they were civic minded, once upon a time. Never fear – I’m sure plenty of those “inactive” voters will reactivate themselves just in time for Barack Obama’s re-election.

You might think these astonishing statistics indicate a crisis-level voter registration problem requiring immediate attention, particularly since this is 2012, not 1912, and modern technology gives us extremely potent tools for accurately managing massive amounts of data. But Attorney General Eric Holder disagrees.

Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted sent Holder a letter back in February, warning that “common sense says that the odds of voter fraud increase the longer these ineligible voters are allowed to populate our rolls… I simply cannot accept that.” Husted said existing federal regulations “limit Ohio’s ability to remove ineligible names, thereby increasing the chance for voter fraud.”

No one from the Justice Department ever responded.
--------------------

Nationwide, the Pew Center for the States estimates about 24 million ineligible voter registrations, including “more than 1.8 million dead people listed as voters; about 2.75 million with voter registrations in more than one state; and about 12 million voter records with incorrect addresses, meaning either the voters moved or errors in the information make it unlikely any mailings can reach them.”

The National Voter Registration Act includes provisions “to ensure that accurate and current voter registration rolls are maintained,” but somehow that part of the NVRA doesn’t seem to count. It’s painfully obvious that we don’t have accurate and current voter registration – not even by the standards of the early Twentieth Century, let alone the early Twenty-First – but the only parts of the NVRA we ever hear cited are the passages that can be used as roadblocks against cleaning up the rolls, or keeping fraudsters away from the polls.
--------------------------

There is absolutely no logical reason for a computerized society to tolerate thousands of ineligible voters on its rolls.

 

[voltnh]

Voter fraud is proven to exist, and 95% of it favors democratic candidates. However, it is mostly limited to solid blue states, anyway.

One of the benefits of the Electoral College is that it dampens affect of voter fraud in a national election. However, it can cause havoc in local and congressional elections. Look at the Allen West race. In some of those precincts, you had 125% voter turnout...

 

[gsvol]

voltnh
Voter fraud is proven to exist, and 95% of it favors democratic candidates. However, it is mostly limited to solid blue states, anyway.

One of the benefits of the Electoral College is that it dampens affect of voter fraud in a national election. However, it can cause havoc in local and congressional elections. Look at the Allen West race. In some of those precincts, you had 125% voter turnout...

In this election it had a great effect in the battleground states.

West is not giving up the fight and now is ahead in the account.

Unlike most so-called republicants, he has a backbone.