The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

So high profile people should be given a free pass to break the law?

Again, don't do the crime if you can't do the time - especially in districts that you've gone out of your way to trash.
Your people have been given a free pass Chief. And you ****ing well know it.
 
But that's the problem. THEY WON'T BE PROSECUTED. There is the blatant proof of the injustice of all this.
Yea Biden held documents for years he wasn't allowed to have.... Hillary had servers and phones destroyed, but trumps different and selective prosecution is fine unless your black or a DNC member or supporter
 
THE MEDIA ISSUE | RULES OF LAW

Inside the Off-the-Record Calls Held by Anti-Trump Legal Pundits​

Some of the country’s most prominent legal commentators are holding off-the-record sessions to hash out the latest twists and turns in Donald Trump’s legal saga.



As the Jan. 6 committee was working on its bombshell investigation into the Capitol riot and President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the last election, committee staffers took some time out of their seemingly 24-hour jobs one day in 2022 to brief a group of lawyers and legal pundits on a Zoom call.

The people on the call weren’t affiliated with the investigation or the government. But they would have been familiar to anyone who watches cable news. They were some of the country’s most well-known legal and political commentators, and they were there to get insights into the committee’s work and learn about what to look for at the hearings.

The group’s gathering was not a one-time event, but in fact an installment in an exclusive weekly digital salon, whose existence has not been previously reported, for prominent legal analysts and progressive and conservative anti-Trump lawyers and pundits. Every Friday, they meet on Zoom to hash out the latest twists and turns in the Trump legal saga — and intellectually stress-test the arguments facing Trump on his journey through the American legal system.

The meetings are off the record — a chance for the group’s members, many of whom are formally or loosely affiliated with different media outlets, to grapple with a seemingly endless array of novel legal issues before they hit the airwaves or take to print or digital outlets to weigh in with their thoughts. About a dozen or more people join any given call, though no one takes attendance. Some group members wouldn’t describe themselves with any partisan or ideological lean, but most are united by their dislike of Trump.

The group’s host is Norman Eisen, a senior Obama administration official, longtime Trump critic and CNN legal analyst, who has been convening the group since 2022 as Trump’s legal woes ramped up. Eisen was also a key member of the team of lawyers assembled by House Democrats to handle Trump’s first impeachment.

The regular attendees on Eisen’s call include Bill Kristol, the longtime conservative commentator, and Laurence Tribe, the famed liberal constitutional law professor. John Dean, who was White House counsel under Richard Nixon before pleading guilty to obstruction of justice in connection with Watergate, joins the calls, as does George Conway, a conservative lawyer and co-founder of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project. Andrew Weissmann, a longtime federal prosecutor who served as one of the senior prosecutors on Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russia investigation and is now a legal analyst for MSNBC, is another regular on the calls. Jeffrey Toobin, a pioneer in the field of cable news legal analysis, is also a member of the crew. The rest of the group includes recognizable names from the worlds of politics, law and media.

Sometimes there is a special guest, like the Jan. 6 committee staffers (who recalled briefing the group). One Friday last May, after E. Jean Carroll defeated Trump in the first of her two defamation cases to go to trial, her lawyer Roberta Kaplan joined as a guest to talk for roughly half an hour about her strategy for beating Trump in court. Another time, J. Michael Luttig, a conservative legal scholar and former judge who helped lead the public campaign to disqualify Trump under the 14th Amendment, showed up to make his case.


 
No orange man bad equals guilty till proven innocent and even then...he's still guilty....see Russian collision for the gameplan

An indictment indicates that a jury believes there is sufficient physical evidence or sworn testimony that there is probable cause a crime has been committed.

Watching you guys stumble all over yourselves pretending that trump is a victim and that everyone is out to get him is hilarious.
 
Your people? Damn

As you're aware - this is the MAGA safe space fall back, whenever things aren't going their way or the argument gets inconvenient, they paint you as a supporter of the other tribes leader.

It's a lazy, low rent way to redirect the argument to a place they can feel better about themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
An indictment indicates that a jury believes there is sufficient physical evidence or sworn testimony that there is probable cause a crime has been committed.

Watching you guys stumble all over yourselves pretending that trump is a victim and that everyone is out to get him is hilarious.
99.99 % of all grand juries return indictments...hence the purchase about indicting a ham sandwich...

Maybe when Trump wins his appeal and get immunity you'll self immolate in protest and save us all from your desperate trump hate..
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
An indictment indicates that a jury believes there is sufficient physical evidence or sworn testimony that there is probable cause a crime has been committed.

Watching you guys stumble all over yourselves pretending that trump is a victim and that everyone is out to get him is hilarious.
Glad you find it funny. Unfortunately the Republicans are to afraid to fight the same kind of warfare.
 
As you're aware - this is the MAGA safe space fall back, whenever things aren't going their way or the argument gets inconvenient, they paint you as a supporter of the other tribes leader.

It's a lazy, low rent way to redirect the argument to a place they can feel better about themselves.
😂
 
99.99 % of all grand juries return indictments...hence the purchase about indicting a ham sandwich...

Maybe when Trump wins his appeal and get immunity you'll self immolate in protest and save us all from your desperate trump hate..

And more than 95% of those go on to become convictions.

DA's don't bring losers to grand juries.

The only thing being immolated are MAGA excuses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
Your a leftist, you just won't admit it.
As you're aware - this is the MAGA safe space fall back, whenever things aren't going their way or the argument gets inconvenient, they paint you as a supporter of the other tribes leader.

It's a lazy, low rent way to redirect the argument to a place they can feel better about themselves.
 
And more than 95% of those go on to become convictions.

DA's don't bring losers to grand juries.

The only thing being immolated are MAGA excuses.
Yes because the defendant end up pleasing due to the government having unlimited funds while the defendants don't.. Legit research it..
 
If not offended why do you feel the need to insult everyone..that show low intelligence and well as weak skin..again you expose yourself every post. Keep it going
That's rich coming from a guy who proudly supports the most offended guy on the planet who has personally insulted EVERYONE who has ever disagreed or criticized him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact

VN Store



Back
Top