That's racist!

I assumed “diabolical lies about women” was something referring to Transgender ideology. Idk 🤷‍♀️
He didn't really flesh out that thought, but I assumed he was referring to the lie that the way for women to have a fulfilling life is to eschew the idea of raising a family and instead dedicate their prime child bearing and rearing years to advancing their careers and helping billionaire ceo's get a bigger bonus.
 
Yes for sure, very normal to be ranting about Biden murdering babies and Pride Month being a deadly sin and Jews getting special treatment and women being told the "diabolical lie" that having a career is a good thing. What on Earth was the NFL thinking distancing itself from such a normal guy

Just trying to drive up merch sales.
 
They want money including from female fans, gay fans and whoever else. When someone is going viral saying homemaker is the most important title/Pride Month is a sin and the reaction from the NFL atmosphere is male fans going "HELL YEAH BROTHER" it's not a great way to attract those people

So if a player were to make a speech and say that the most important title for a male is husband and father, the NFL will issue a "distancing" comment in order to attract more single men who don't have children?
 
SIAP and wasn't certain where to put this but since it's over racial allegations I went here. AI fakes are going to become a more prevalent thing going forward for certain.

It gets better lol -

 
  • Like
Reactions: hndog609
A very public statement that domestic violence is bad? That’s why they have a domestic violence policy and suspensions. The NFL can’t allow the perception that they support those ideas but they won’t and shouldn’t discipline him with a suspension or fine, so they made a statement.

Acting like he’s being treated worse than Deshaun Watson is insane and mostly advanced by the “conservative white men are such victims” crowd
One can always count on a low life liberal to be against someone being able to exercise their right of freedom of speech just because it hurts their delicate little feeling
 
One can always count on a low life liberal to be against someone being able to exercise their right of freedom of speech just because it hurts their delicate little feeling
Who said I'm "against his right to be able to exercise his right of freedom of speech," or are you just stupid and made that up?
 
I know the left can get their jimmies rustled at the smallest thing, but the whining and fabrication I've heard the past few days about what Butker said is shameful. It really seems like all the talking heads haven't actually read or listened to it. They're just going off what they heard someone else say or someone's interpretation.

He's mostly calling out catholic leaders for slacking in their duties for the first half of the speech or more. Being a stay at home parent is a good and honorable choice. Men be active in your families. And the the last large portion was about what kind of Catholic mass Catholics attend.

Read it for yourself.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols

What good are bodycams if cops are allowed to turn them off...ever?

Its complete BS and should result in suspension without pay whenever it happens unless the cop can prove there was a malfunction in the camera. They should have to carry extra batteries or an extra camera in the glovebox of their cruiser too to prevent that from happening.

The point...purpose rather of these cameras is to protect CITIZENS from police infringing their rights or abusing THEM. The extra benefit of the cams is that for an honest, good cop the cams also protect the officer from any fraudulent claims of sexual assault by females, harrassment, police brutality, racism, or any other inappropriate conduct by folks they interact with who are looking to ruin the cop. There should be a no tolerance policy for cops without working bodycams though...they are either on and recording all the time, or they are worthless.
 
What good are bodycams if cops are allowed to turn them off...ever?

Its complete BS and should result in suspension without pay whenever it happens unless the cop can prove there was a malfunction in the camera. They should have to carry extra batteries or an extra camera in the glovebox of their cruiser too to prevent that from happening.

The point...purpose rather of these cameras is to protect CITIZENS from police infringing their rights or abusing THEM. The extra benefit of the cams is that for an honest, good cop the cams also protect the officer from any fraudulent claims of sexual assault by females, harrassment, police brutality, racism, or any other inappropriate conduct by folks they interact with who are looking to ruin the cop. There should be a no tolerance policy for cops without working bodycams though...they are either on and recording all the time, or they are worthless.
It’s for everyone’s protection. The Leo’s protection. The Citizen’s protection.

On at all times. No exceptions.

And not just “on duty”. If you are wearing your badge and a gun - cameras on, period.

Don’t want to run your camera when you are “off duty”? Take your badge and gun off.
 

VN Store



Back
Top