DyronNix
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 1,115
- Likes
- 32
Doesn't the NCAA have to mitigate the punishment it would've handed down on Bruce Pearl because he came back to them shortly after lying and admitted he had done so?
If not, then there is never any incentive for a coach/player/institution to cooperate with the NCAA when it investigates. Why admit mistakes when the NCAA gives you no credit for doing so?
Lying to the NCAA is not something it will take lightly. And it plays by its own rules as we all know. The simple answer is: don't lie in the first place. But that is not reality.
The NCAA almost has to stop short of a death blow against Bruce because he did come clean. What that translates into remains to be seen.
If not, then there is never any incentive for a coach/player/institution to cooperate with the NCAA when it investigates. Why admit mistakes when the NCAA gives you no credit for doing so?
Lying to the NCAA is not something it will take lightly. And it plays by its own rules as we all know. The simple answer is: don't lie in the first place. But that is not reality.
The NCAA almost has to stop short of a death blow against Bruce because he did come clean. What that translates into remains to be seen.