Let me ask a rhetorical question (I know what some of you would already say if it was Obama), but what if a filmmaker in another country made a movie that was about an assassination attempt on a POTUS? Would you call it art or would you have outrage?
The real video we should be watching is not The Interview but US Strategic Commands deterrence symposium from August 14, 2014. At minute 23.35 (see here), recently retired US Major General John MacDonald who served until recently in US Forces Korea/Combined Forces Command/UN Command in Korea, advocates including assassination of North Koreans in STRATCOMs policy options kitbag for dealing with Kim Jong Un over the next three years.
Unlike The Interview, this movie is not satirical, nor is it fictional. It is posted by US Strategic Command, the military command that plans for using nuclear weapons against North Korea. Cyber Command that may lead US retaliation against North Korea is a component of Strategic Command.
Stratcom.mil is the one website that we can be assured that the North Koreans monitor on a daily basis. This video is on a US government website. As Commander-in-Chief, President Obama owns this assassination video.
Sony Hack: New Evidence Points to Inside Job Say Security Experts - The Hollywood Reporter
Hmm. The FBI & DOJ have some explaining to do
The software they used is known to be mainly used by Russia, China, and Iran. NK got help from one of those countries at some point to carry this out.
And if they have the capability to actually build a nuclear bomb, then I bet they can hack computers.
There was a fellow on Fox this morning making a pretty convincing case that the evidence is extremely thin that it was North Korea. Apparently, the only basis for that is a "call back" script within the malware that told it to send data to an IP address in North Korea. But this guy explained that it could just be part of the malware, which had been used before. It doesn't mean it came from there and in fact there are many instances where there are multiple call back scripts in the same malware, to different places.
He said given the volume and type of information taken, he is very skeptical that it was done by someone solely outside Sony, that it has all the earmarks of an inside job, perhaps a disgruntled employee. Someone familiar with their system and its contents, and who has basically committed the crime and left a note from someone else taking the blame/credit.
Now, let me also play devil's advocate here on the notion that whoever did this might well have done us an enormous favor. Consider:
1) This incident has brought the issue to the fore. There is now discussion about making available to business some of the more advanced government techniques to defend against cyber attacks. Though the issue has been talked about before, we have a concrete example and that might make everyone more careful.
2) We're out one movie. Not a nuclear power plant or air traffic control, or the nation's banking system. And apparently, according to the critics who did see it, we are out one pretty bad movie.
Just saying, if the issue is going to go to the top of the list of things for us to deal with, maybe this wasn't such a bad way to get it there. There could be worse.
Let me ask a rhetorical question (I know what some of you would already say if it was Obama), but what if a filmmaker in another country made a movie that was about an assassination attempt on a POTUS? Would you call it art or would you have outrage?
A disgruntled employee is far more likely than some kind of North Korean plot.
Sony hackers threaten moviegoers with terrorist acts - Dec. 16, 2014
New York premiere of 'The Interview' canceled | Fox News
Sounds like a bunch of kids, but I do hope they track them down.