I thought the article had too much "woe is me" hand wringing about facilities and tried a little too hard to distance Serrano from accountability for his team's performance over the past six years.
I would like to see someone acknowledge a) that his CWS appearances might have blinded people to the advantages he had at CSF (reasonable tuition, accommodating admissions standards, and tons of SoCal talent that wants to stay home, playing in a non-power five conference against schools without his recruiting opportunities, perennial contender, long chain of successful coaches, enthusiastic fan base, being the premiere sport at a non-football school) and b) that CDS was hired to do something here he had never done before: namely, manage the turnaround of a cellar dweller in the toughest conference in the country.