bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,096
- Likes
- 45,671
While I agree that DT has done a great job of developing them and deserves credit, why were people on here not giving Martin credit for developing McRae, Golden, Maymon, Richardson, etc. I'm not a Martin fan per se, just playing Devils advocate.
Volbeast33, you gonna let him post this? We all know a coach doesn't develop players, it's time to set the record straight VB33!
I just don't get the thought that CDT has worked some miracle with Hubbs. He played maybe 12 games last year then had shoulder surgery so he missed practically a whole year of practice and game experience. While CDT may be developing him, I am not sure that the improvement we are seeing isn't just as much of Hubbs finally healthy and getting the reps and experience he needs as it is coaching.
Player development was not the problem with Martin. Player effort was not the problem with Martin. Scheme and probably recruiting were the problems with Martin. He couldn't coach much more than a man to man defense, he couldn't coach an offense against a zone, and he couldn't draw up a play when needed.
But, he inherited very little experience his first year and should be commended for that.
You know I'm not really black and white on this. There has to be some player development involved as a coach if you're just talking. I don't know if the individual attention was there with Martin. Tyndall is just head and shoulders above anyone with what he has managed to do with this team. Josh Richardson, a point guard, get outta here!! :detective:I guess that's where we disagree. Hubbs was injured last year and Reese/Armani/Lopez had better players in front of them.
You know I'm not really black and white on this. There has to be some player development involved as a coach if you're just talking. I don't know if the individual attention was there with Martin. Tyndall is just head and shoulders above anyone with what he has managed to do with this team. Josh Richardson, a point guard, get outta here!! :detective:
From what I have seen in the last two weeks, I think Hubbs will become a much better player than McRae.
I'm not ready to go there yet because offensively speaking, RH3 has a major hole in his game (ball-handling) that McRae didn't have. Jordy could do it all, and Hubbs poor ball-handling skills severely limits his ability to create his own shot. That really separates them in my mid right now. If Hubbs can clean up his handle and become quicker with the ball, then he can be great.
I don't know Chris, McRae's handle was not good. I believe it was one of the problems he needed to fix at the next level. I am not saying Hubbs is better, but Jordy had trouble with the ball in traffic. It got better every year, but it still wasn't great. JMO.
I didn't mean to imply that McRae was highly-skilled in every way offensively, but Jordy had little problem getting to the rack, or creating his own shot, especially later in his career as you stated. Hubbs doesn't even try at this point. He strictly scores on open looks and putbacks. That's not necessarily a credit to McRae's ball-handling skills as much as it is an indictment against Hubbs. Remember, Zo tinkered with McRae at PG, so his handle obviously wasn't awful. I wouldn't call it a strength, but it wasn't necessarily a glaring weakness in his game to the point that it severely limited his ability to create like it has Hubbs to this point.
In light of CCM trying AM at PG, should we view the above as evidence of anything at all ball handling wise?
While I agree that DT has done a great job of developing them and deserves credit, why were people on here not giving Martin credit for developing McRae, Golden, Maymon, Richardson, etc. I'm not a Martin fan per se, just playing Devils advocate.