You keep saying they dropped criminal charges - they did not. They never brought them presumably due to the facts in the case.
Bush admin officials decided that criminal charges were not supported so they brought civil claims. The Obama administration officials secured an injunction pursuant to that and felt that was sufficient. Both are totally understandable. But the right wing race-baiting hate machine declares Obama a reverse racist, and ignores the decision of the Bush administration.
Both were within their discretion. But because some right wing nutjob looking for some publicity predictably cries foul, the discretion exercised by the Obama appointees is questioned.
The illogic of it, the stupidity of it, is mind boggling.
They did bring civil charges. Obama's DOJ dropped them citing insufficient evidence and no one is buying that. The case was won.
No one? The case was won? What was won? What more could they get than the injunction? Why was the discfretion exercised by the Obama DOJ such an affornt but the discretion by the Bush DOJ "routine."
If this type decision is routine, why is the Civil Rights Commission issuing supoena's to the DOJ? Why do they claim the Obama DOJ's explanation doesn't hold water?
They don't "claim" anything. See, typical right wing wacko sleight of hand. You are as intellectually bankrupt as Feaux News with their banners "Some authorities complain that ...."
It's all crap. It's them speculating. They put on a vague tag, and boom, its news. It's "news." I pray to God you are not in academia because your argument process is about as corrupted by politics as any I've seen.
It is you that is trying to cover the Obama DOJ actions by claiming something that never happened (Bush DOJ dropped criminal charges that they had brought).
Fine, they opted to file civil rather than criminal. You have yet to answer the point that the Obama administration got an actual result for that effort. And, you havce yet to articulate what additional relief they could have obtained, much less whether it would have been worth the expense.
You accused FOX of changing its story on criminal charges and demanded someone show you an article that Obama's DOJ dropped the criminal charges.
It has been pointed out to you repeatedly that such charges were never filed.
You can produce nothing to support your charge that FOX mislead or misrpresented the story and alleged Obama's DOJ dropped criminal charges. Nothing, Zip, Nada.
I don't agree. Where is the proof that the Obama administration did something here for racial reasons? I mean, other than former disgruntled employee in his basement in his underwear eating cheetos and fancying himself a junior Matt Drudge?
Not surprisingly you have the gall to claim we are the ones being dishonest. Your whole argument was based on false accusations.