Sorry, but Jones is being stupid. There was NO North "report"--there was an idiotic internet rumor that was based on nothing. It's unfortunate, but that's the way the internet functions a lot of the time--idiotically.
Jones earlier this week made a dumb comment about injuries, saying that (actual) reports on injuries were not respectful to the players. That's crazy, and proves that Jones is just another coach who is clueless about the media. There is nothing "disrespectful" about reporting on actual injuries--that a guy has a ankle or knee sprain or bruised ribs or whatever. Where comes this idea that if you report that a guy has a sprained shoulder you are violating his "privacy." UT is a public university, the players are individuals in whom there is a public interest--a strong public interest.
Has it occurred to the coaches--in all sports, not to mention the sports information department--that if the the athletic department actually //provided information on injuries//, instead of hewing to their silly hush-hush routine, that there would be no internet rumors and speculation? You want to stop the North rumors, then tell the public he's got a knee sprain or whatever and the rumors stop--and there is no privacy issue. If your friend comes hobbling into your house one day on crutches, I'm pretty sure you and everyone else would ask what his injury is, and I'm quite sure he'd tell you and everyone else and not think much about his "privacy."
To be sure, certain issues require discretion and privacy--an addiction issue, a psychological issue--but the vast major of sports injuries are the same sports injuries that players have gotten, and that have been reported, for ages with nary a problem. I'm not sure if it is the Hipaa law that is absurd--or, more likely, the way colleges have decided to interpret it. But I fail to see how reporting that a sports player has, say, a hyperextended elbow is a big deal or a privacy issue of any kind. It's gotten ridiculous.