Iam4utalways
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2015
- Messages
- 13,528
- Likes
- 9,821
QB - Dobbs: No where near the 1st down field consistency needs to improve vastly to even be a 2nd.
RB - Hurd: Another strong season could solidify his 1st round pull but history says early 2
WR - Williams: To early to evaluate certainly has the talent and measurables
TE - Wolf: I can't see him taken in 1 unless he becomes a permanent option due to injury middle to late 2
DE - Barnett: This guy has the talent, ability, and measurables to get to a Berry like draft pick. He's an absolute monster off the edge.
DT - Tuttle: to early but really like what I've seen so far.
DT - McKenzie: really a dream at DT just needs to fix conditioning to really see what we have.
LB - Kirkland: of all the young kids I really like the way he plays I really think he's going to be a middle 1 pick
CB - Sutton: this one is tricky for me 2 seasons ago I thought he was a sure fire 1 after last season hes a 2
CB - Martin: 1st pick in the draft.
I'm stuck between 10-2 and 11-1. I lean towards 11-1 though if we're relatively healthy. Well played, Vegas.
The most likely loss to me is Georgia, IMHO. I understand those that are worried about A&M, but I think that we out match them in many key areas. My only worry is that we'd be a little banged up after Florida and Georgia.
You're calling a team in which Colton Jumper gets meaningful snaps one of the best college football rosters ever. Lol
Since Wolf hasn't run a 40, none of us know his timed speed.
All I know is what I see on TV. And I don't see any difference in speed or explosiveness.
Wolf will be Greg Olsen 2.0. Take it to the bank.
7 games in a row, that's a tall task. 5 being VT, GA, FL, Bama and aTm....i think 3-2 in those 5 is pretty strong. 4-1 would be out freakin standing.
that's why i'd take the under if i'm betting. 10-2 or worse seems a lot more likely than 11-1 or better.
7 games in a row, that's a tall task. 5 being VT, GA, FL, Bama and aTm....i think 3-2 in those 5 is pretty strong. 4-1 would be out freakin standing.
that's why i'd take the under if i'm betting. 10-2 or worse seems a lot more likely than 11-1 or better.
i think you may be giving VT too much credit.Virginia Tech will be what Northwestern was to us in the Outback Bowl. We should win comfortably.
I agree with you, it's going to be difficult to pull off. 10-2 is a very likely outcome. If we're healthy, 9-3 would leave me seriously scratching my head, though.
I could easily see us with one loss going into the Alabama game. And even though I give us an ever so slight edge on them this year, it could easily go the other way.
I agree with you, it's going to be difficult to pull off. 10-2 is a very likely outcome. If we're healthy, 9-3 would leave me seriously scratching my head, though.
I could easily see us with one loss going into the Alabama game. And even though I give us an ever so slight edge on them this year, it could easily go the other way.
Virginia Tech will be what Northwestern was to us in the Outback Bowl. We should win comfortably.
I worry about this team doing exactly what they're asked to do, get multiple score leads late in games again, only to not be allowed to finish those all but certain wins, AGAIN, because Butch decides to go curl up in the fetal position somewhere, AGAIN.
Team 120 is a championship team on paper and very likely on the field as well IMO. But I've seen Jones oversee a "slip up" vs Vandy in 2013, vs Florida in 2014, and vs Oklahoma and Florida in 2015. Everyone is certainly free to look past those previous "slip ups" under Butch as they try to predict what this year will look like. I'm gonna choose to factor those in until further notice.
We'll see. I think he's just as athletic. And will be just as good a pro.
I think a lot on here are underestimating Bud Foster. The guy can coach a defense. Ask OSU a couple of years ago. If Fuente had hired a new DC, then I would completely agree with you. Now we MAY run VT off the field, but I would not be surprised if the game is much closer.
You also thought North would go in the 4th round or earlier (went undrafted) and that Kelvin Taylor was the second best RB in the draft (think he was the 13th RB taken in the 6th rd). With all due respect, think I'll pass on your assessment.
What does how low he went have to do with how good a pro he will be?
Tom Brady and Terrell Davis also went in the 6th round.
I never said he would go high. I just said his skill would translate really well to the pros and he would be ultimately be the second best back in the 2016 draft.
Brady and Davis were anomalies.....that's why everybody uses them as their examples....they were damn near the only ones who were drafted that late to play at the very high, All-Pro/HOF level that they have.
Perhaps Taylor winds up being a very good pro and you're proven right...perhaps not. Just pointing out that 12 teams needing a running back passed on him in favor of another guy. And it's not exactly like Kelvin killed it last year at Florida....he was the conference's 10th leading rusher.
And, I won't re-visit North again....lets just leave it there.
Goodness gracious. This is yalls problem. Battered and bruised fans. I don't have this problem.
Tennesse has NEVER had a team this talented. So history is irrelevant.