I think, "you know, actual law" is why the judge has injuncted the certification, "textbook laches" notwithstanding. If damages are incurred by a law then shown to be unconstitutional, government doesn't get to say "sorry, it was law"; you have legal redress. Damages are the catalyst for requesting redress. Not to mention laches concerns the plaintiff allowing an undue delay to occur after damages before requesting relief, and is clearly not the case here; this occurred Nov 3.
I disagree; the vote for president is a federal election of 50 states. If three states with similar constitutional disability can swing that election, the remainder of states - at least those not subscribing to the same candidate - are materially damaged and not afforded equal protection. That aside from those PA voters disenfranchised by Act 77. And the further illegal actions of the SoS violating Art. II of the U.S. constitution by allowing 110-120K votes arriving after the deadline, to count. The margin for Biden in PA is currently 80K.
The argument further presupposes all those voters would have voted in person and that there is not substantial fraud/malfeasance among the 2.6M PA mail ballots returned. I expect the 5-2 Dem controlled PA SC to find against, and SCOTUS to hear the case.
