Vercingetorix
Fluidmaster
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 31,177
- Likes
- 2,727
nuts in South Carolina...That part I KNOW..BTW,Not defending anyone here...I think I said Majors was what he was without calling him a name...As for Fulmer, a backstabber? I have no proof and if anyone has something other than heresay,then air it..It doesnt change a thing in what happended today to throw around baloney like that when someone asks a point blank question..Oh I forgot, this is the internet, you can say whay you want with no recourse~~
]
I can't help but notice that you're posting anonymously too, JohnnyBall. So can the sanctimony.
It's clearly problematic to provide links to 16-year-old news stories, so anything you get here is by definition going to be hearsay. It was common knowledge at the time -- and by common, I mean that everybody around campus knew it -- that Fulmer was part of what was going on; that he was actively angling for the job. That wouldn't pass muster in a court or a newspaper, of course, but as contemporary eyewitness testimony as to the prevailing belief on campus at the time, I think it rises to the standard required on an Internet message board. If you require more "proof" to avoid being offended, then perhaps message boards aren't for you.
Last edited: