I have a question about the two USM players ruled ineligible, Rasham Suarez and Jeremiah Eason.
The two players transferred in from the College of Central Florida, formerly Central Florida Community College, formerly Central Florida Junior College.
Now, from what I understand, you just don't waltz in off the street, present your transcripts and say, "I want to play." You have to be vetted. This applies High School Graduates, Prep School attendees, and Junior College transfers.
The first vetting comes from the Office of Compliance at the University's Athletic Department. They will look at your transcripts and test scores and determine if you meet NCAA eligibility requirements.
The second vetting comes from the University's Admissions Office. They will look at your transcripts, if you are coming from another college, or JC, to see if you are eligible to be admitted to the university, and which of your courses are recognized. Not all courses taken at one college transfer to another, although they normally recognize degrees received. If you are coming from either a high or prep school they will want to see your test scores, either ACT or SAT or both.
The third vetting comes from the NCAA Clearing House. They will also look at your transcripts and test scores and determine if you meet NCAA eligibility requirements. They are the final word on eligibility.
The main feature of all these offices is that they don't trust you. They will contact either the testing service, your previous institution, or both and ask for their own copies of your transcripts and/or test scores. If they have a question about a course you took the will contact the school that administered the course.
This is my question, how were these two players deemed eligible to participate?
This is a great question and I've spent a little time looking into it and will continue to do so, maybe I can find some examples at other schools and that might be of some help.
It seems like a straight forward, narrow question.
The NCAA Clearinghouse is now called the NCAA Eligibility Center, something I did not know. There is no way to KNOW, definitively, the answer to your question because we don't know where the specific break down was or a loop hole that might exist.
In just the little that I've read, the JUCO transfer requirements/rules...it seems pretty complicated, in my opinion complicated enough that someone such as an academic advisor or coach would have to explain it to the average student athlete and as a parent me too.
Also, new rules were put into place in 2012 regarding JUCO's, I mention this because I guess it's possible an honest mistake could have been made by folks at USM. However, I doubt that two athletes would lose their eligibility over an honest mistake. I don't know.
We've all been witness to the highly recruited JUCO that we covet and recruit only to find out our school won't accept him but one of our rival schools will. But this is at the highest level.
I spent a lot of time going over the rosters for CDT's USM teams. Where did this guy come from, what about this guy and so on. I had no idea the TRUE transient nature of basketball at that level. We're talking about guys at four year colleges ending up at juco colleges coming out as prop 48 (Unqualified academically) that sit out for the year and end up transferring again due to a coaching change for example.
But if they can play, somebody wants them. Is it a coach who says "hey kid don't worry about it, we've got people in place that can get you into school"? Is it some messing with transcripts that don't get caught as they should? Is it not registering a kid with Eligibility Center, is that even possible? (I'm asking, I don't know). It seems like for every rule an organization as big as the NCAA makes, there's always someone looking for a way around it, at least to me.
I guess I didn't answer your question, but something has happened down at USM and what seemed at first like a prop 48 thing is now an academic thing which takes things to another level in my opinion and that of the beat writer down there, Jason Munz.
I'll try to find some examples...when I looked up the Coach's Accountability Rule, which had some do's/don'ts/examples for lack of a better word I saw this...They were bullet points but I did not re-format.
The head coach and staff knew that several incoming two-year institution transfer student-athletes were deficient academically and were taking numerous classes in a short period of time to meet eligibility requirements.

The head coach asked his staff only general questions about the prospective student-athletes' progress and did not ask how the prospective student-athletes were supporting themselves, how the prospective student-athletes were traveling around town, how their classes were being paid for and how involved his staff was with the prospective student-athletes.

The head coach failed to involve the compliance staff in monitoring the prospective student-athletes' situations.
I'll try to find some other things on the issue and I appreciate the question, I've learned something from trying to answer it.
Sorry for the long post.