chuckiepoo
Beach Thong Sports ⚽️
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 48,392
- Likes
- 135,816
The Caitlin Clark snubs have reached a fever pitch.
One year after fellow WNBA players ranked Clark ninth among guards in All-Star voting, she fell to 11th among her peers in balloting released Thursday.
The 24-year-old Fever star was still voted in as a starter for the July 25 game at Chicago’s United Center, as she was ranked second among fans and third by the media.
![]()
WNBA players rank Caitlin Clark shockingly low in All-Star voting — again
The Caitlin Clark snubs have reached a fever pitch.nypost.com

Couldn't resist when this passed in front of us today! The team name is "The Juggernauts.""Television viewership and live gate attendance peaked in the late 1960s, drawing around 15 million weekly viewers on national broadcasts."
It was during this era that I learned to fear 200-pound blondes on wheels. Despite its "vast wasteland" critics, TV performed educational services even back then.
I have never an official WNBA commentator state during a game they are calling or during the half-time break coverage that the Fever would be better without CC.When do the WNBA commentators and "experts" start saying Atlanta would be better off without Angel?
I don't think so. Because so far Angel is into being a good supportive teammate to a degree that almost puts your teeth on edge. And also it's Ryan Howard and Alicia Gray so how mad is anyone gonna get at the world's chillest duo? I think the dream are just way too live or die by the 3 and mostly they've been dying by it lately. Semesco is one of those analytic cult members. Jordan Canada can be really good but also inconsistent. I think they're about to get Bree Jones back so shoud help. But Angel has done her part Bulldogging the boards and has been saying the right things.Angel Reese's Atlanta Dream have lost five consecutive games. Will Reese soon be blaming the mounting losses on her teammates, or her coach?
I think more than a few people think this Fever squad is better without the current version of CC. Started thinking that when they unexpectedlymade a playoff run without her last year. Maybe not the idealized version, but arguably better sans the current version. Mitchell and Boston absolutely bloom when she's out. And that's not really a criticism of CC, just what happens when you share oxygen with a superstar. Let alone one that draws the extra ish that CC does. To me they play relieved when she isn't around.I have never an official WNBA commentator state during a game they are calling or during the half-time break coverage that the Fever would be better without CC.
But I don't watch every game of course so I must have missed that moment? Do you recall who said it?
As for "experts", Angel gets plenty of social media grief so I am sure that narrative is already out there.
I'm actually really enjoying it. See above the backup cast of characters is pretty darn strong.A'ja Wilson and Caitlin Clark both out for tonight's game. Not exactly must watch TV....
Who said CC was best Player in WNBA? She may not be best player but she is the most MARKETABLE..... Puts money in her pocket and bring more exposure to the League...The Fever do seem to play better without CC, but could you imagine the firestorm if they do decide to trade her? What would happen to those pro CC and Fever podcasters who always spew vial comments on anyone or the league if they feel she has been disrespected. As an example, although CC was voted as a starter for the all star game, they say there was cheating because she wasn’t the number 1 vote getter. These people don’t seem to understand that there are other talented people in the W, many of them better than CC. Most of us who watch A lot of college basketball know that one player dominating a team does not win a championship. Sure, there are players who step up when needed, but relying on one player day in and day out is not good. Oh one other thing, Mitchell and Boston are more important players on the Fever than CC. My opinion of course, but seems to be true.
The "best" is most usually subjective, so I agree with you there. I also agree that she's the most marketable and putting money in both her pockets and the rest of the WNBA. Much like Venus Williams' impact on equal pay in tennis, you can't discount CC's impact on the overall salary increases.Who said CC was best Player in WNBA? She may not be best player but she is the most MARKETABLE..... Puts money in her pocket and bring more exposure to the League...
But her marketability is, in part, based on the narrative that she is a game changing, "generational" talent. That is the idea that generates all the smoke and leads to insane conspiracy theories when she is not dominating the league.Who said CC was best Player in WNBA? She may not be best player but she is the most MARKETABLE..... Puts money in her pocket and bring more exposure to the League...
