wittenvols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2010
- Messages
- 156
- Likes
- 74
Don't claim to be a professional, but here is my observation/opinion...
Simms has the better command of the huddle and administration of the offense, but he holds on to the ball to long, instead hitting his back foot on his drops and throwing the ball he stutters and this allows the defenders a better chance at defending the ball... his accuracy his also spotty at best.
Bray on the other hand is the exact opposite of Simms, what he lacks in game administration he makes up for in accuracy and most importantly in my book he hits his back foot and gets rid of the ball when its there. He better antcipates the routes giving the receivers a better play on the ball.
So I believe you roll the dice on Bray expecting his weakness to improve whereas Simms weakness are what thy are
Simms has the better command of the huddle and administration of the offense, but he holds on to the ball to long, instead hitting his back foot on his drops and throwing the ball he stutters and this allows the defenders a better chance at defending the ball... his accuracy his also spotty at best.
Bray on the other hand is the exact opposite of Simms, what he lacks in game administration he makes up for in accuracy and most importantly in my book he hits his back foot and gets rid of the ball when its there. He better antcipates the routes giving the receivers a better play on the ball.
So I believe you roll the dice on Bray expecting his weakness to improve whereas Simms weakness are what thy are