lifeisdeep
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2017
- Messages
- 2,947
- Likes
- 3,718
This is such basic common sense that it astounds me that anyone would argue with it. Common sense tells one that someone with experience doing anything is probably going to be better at it than someone with no experience: if you had to have open-heart surgery, would you pick someone who had just graduated from Harvard medical school at the top of his class but had never performed the surgery in question, or someone who had graduated from a lesser university but had performed 100 open-heart surgeries and was known as one of the top heart surgeons in the country?This point about HCs being coordinators at one point is a pointless point to make here. This would be true and a fine point to make if we’re a lower level Power 5 or a school in a smaller conference. But we’re not. We’re a Power 5 school with a tradition that rivals every other school save maybe Bama and ND. We’re also about to get hit with massive sanctions and we just got done playing the coordinator-to-head coach route, it didn’t end well and proved this isn’t a place to learn on the job. We don’t have the 5* recruits to set him up with a good start and our roster is getting depleted by the day. Elliott is a fantastic coach with a fantastic resume, but this isn’t the right time to go that route. I’ll also add that it’s easy to look amazing when you have that 5* talent and are coaching under one of the best the business, but it’s also a huge risk that we just can’t afford at the moment. Rewind the clock 3 years, sure give him the keys, but not now in 2021 after what all we’ve been through.
It's great that we finally hired an AD with a track record. Does that mean all of us fans know nothing whatsoever about football, that we can't tell with our own eyes the difference between a good football coach such as Hugh Freeze or Matt Campbell, and a bad one such as the one we just fired? It does not. Does it mean the new AD should have no expectations and be allowed to do whatever he feels, just because he has the title and we don't? It does not.
It's great that White already has candidates in mind, if indeed he does. Do the words, "Athletic Director," beside his name mean we are obligated to smile and thank him regardless of whether he utilizes common sense in this hire? They do not. It's great if he thinks the world of Elliott and thinks he potentially could be a great head coach - but that's a guess. Unless he can see into the future, he has nothing other than his opinion of the man to base that on - and that makes hiring him a gamble. Hiring a coach who has already proven he can do it, by doing it, is comparatively not a gamble, and it's just basic common sense, considering both the tradition and resources of our program and the state of said program at this juncture, to expect Mr. White to not gamble with the future of this football program, just because he can.
Last edited: