Which position group...

#27
#27
Agree but couldn't we count Ferguson as a 7?

Quite simply, we don't need a 7 (this year) so it can really be left off the list. We have two supposedly very good true freshmen qb's. Fergs has 4 more years to play (hope it stays so for 2 more games.)

Peterson is in the mix, as well. Honestly, it would be a waste of a scholly unless we could offer it to Brice Petty or Tajh Boyd, but I think that ship sailed long ago thanks to some unemployed dude.

An extra beast prowling the defensive side of the field would be more useful.

AV
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#28
#28
Pretty sure there is a thread for just about every topic already. So many in fact that I can't keep up. So I post what I'm thinking and I figure you guys will let me know if it's been posted already. :good!:

I think he meant the other thread of yours that was started today.
 
#29
#29
D-line for me. It will be nice to have a nasty D-line that is nasty and fast. I'm not excited about Jakob Johnson though mainly because we have taken a lot of diamond in the rough guys the past few years and we see how those worked out. I would prefer that scholly be used for the 2015 class.
 
#30
#30
I was referring to the thread above that you started a few minutes before starting this one. Almost identical but no worries post away. :hi:

my bad. I originally made this thread accidentally with a poll and when I tried to go back, it deleted everything I typed so I assumed it didn't post. Mods please delete the first one... which I think they did already. Thanks!
 
#31
#31
Offensive line. Hard to have great success with the offense when your QB doesn’t have time to throw and your RBs are starting at the other team’s unblocked players 2 yards in the backfield.
 
#32
#32
Every recruit on the defensive side of the ball. We need all kinds of help
 
#33
#33
1.) LB
1.) DB
1.) WR & TE
1.) DL
1.) RB
1.) OL
7.) QB (Could possibly move into the #1 spot though :))
 
#34
#34
Im interested to see where these athletes shake out. Berry bros and some of these other guys could mix it up for me.

If we land the german, probably LB.

Otherwise probably RB - i think hurd could be our best talent since early 2000s at RB
 
#35
#35
To be honest, I think all of the positions, with exception of QB, are very solid which is critical for the future. I would have to say right now the LBs, but all of the other positions are close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#37
#37
I'm really excited about our Dline commits we have a empressive group of kids coming in at that position. Also I agree about the LBs in this class

Agree. It's empossible not to be empressed with this very empressive group of recruits. I'm not empervious to how good this class is gonna be. I'm feeling kinda empish.😊👍
 
#38
#38
Agree. It's empossible not to be empressed with this very empressive group of recruits. I'm not empervious to how good this class is gonna be. I'm feeling kinda empish.😊👍

Hey, he made a spelling error, stop trying to emparrass the guy.
 
#41
#41
Quite simply, we don't need a 7 (this year) so it can really be left off the list. We have two supposedly very good true freshmen qb's. Fergs has 4 more years to play (hope it stays so for 2 more games.)

Peterson is in the mix, as well. Honestly, it would be a waste of a scholly unless we could offer it to Brice Petty or Tajh Boyd, but I think that ship sailed long ago thanks to some unemployed dude.

An extra beast prowling the defensive side of the field would be more useful.

AV

Agree.

Thats why I said we could count Ferguson as our #7.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top