volfan2024
“Wanna play ball scarecrow “
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2005
- Messages
- 13,141
- Likes
- 3,020
In-Florida,Tennessee,Vandy
SEC Championship Winner
BUBBLE
Kentucky-19-9
Alabama -19-9
Long Shot
UGA-17-10
Ole Miss-18-10
Miss St-16-11 (lead Western Division)
That being said, Florida is in as a 2 (as it stands)
Tennessee as a 7 or 8
Vandy as a 5 or 6
Kentucky as an 8 or 9
Alabama should sneak in as a 9 or 10
I think Ole Miss will make a decent showing in the SEC tourney they make it as a 9 or 10 assuming Miss. St. doesn't win it.
If Miss. St. wins they SEC tourney (long shot I know) they will make it as a 7 or 8, and Ole Miss is out, possibly taking Bama to the NIT with them
Is the SEC underrated again this year and just beating up on itself? Or are we as mediocre (top to bottom) as we seem.
Florida #2. That's silly.
Its a snapshot of who is where. Right now, Florida has lost two of three. Wisconsin has lost its last two, but one of those was to OSU at OSU by a single bucket, so that's not a very bad loss. Whereas Florida lost to LSU, and looked pretty bad doing it.
Florida players have no one but themselves to blame for the current situation. Should they win tomorrow night and again against Kentuckly to close out the regular season and make it at least to semifinals of the SEC tourney, then in my opinion they have as good a claim to a #1 seed as anybody else, including OSU or Wisconsin.
Vandy is better than you're giving them credit for.i disagree, playing in a weak sec and not playing well as of late. we will see what happens for the rest of the year and in the tourney, but #1 seeds generally don't fall way behind to Vandy twice (losing once) and get smoked by the bottom team in their conference.
If they lose tomorrow though (here's hoping we can pull it off) they HAVE TO win the SEC tourney to be a #1, I think the same about a win against Tennessee and a loss to Kentucky.
Vandy is better than you're giving them credit for.
LSU has the talent to play with anybody on a given night. Their shooting has doomed them, but they won't shoot poorly every night out. They have massively underachieved but are still dangerous with their athleticism and size, especially in their house.
Who has a better resume of those top 4 seeds? UCLA - probably. The rest? Ohio State, who just beat their first ranked team (unless you count the UT gift to them since UT was ranked at the time) has no business there. Wisconsin's resume looks a lot like that of OSU, except they were recently handled by MSU too. North Carolina - two losses to VT and yesterday to MD.
The ACC is a better conference, but only marginally. Top to bottom they're awfully comparable to the SEC.I think NC gets a #1 by the grace of playing in a better conference. I think they will win the ACC tournament as well.
Kansas and Texas A&M I also believe are better teams, and if all goes right they should play in the Big 12 championship game, if everything holds up between now and then and it's a close game, I feel they have arguments for 1 seeds that are as strong as any.
That leaves us with UCLA, who unless something goes horribly wrong the rest of the season, will get a number 1 for, again, playing better basketball in a better conference.
I think Vandy is a good team, but top tier teams shouldn't be in a position to have to make a major comeback twice, to the same team, in the same season. At least not when the other team is not supposed to be on your level.
LSU has been attrocious in the conference season. They may be underachieving, but they were without Glen Davis for the Florida game, Florida (if they really are a top tier team) should have eaten them up inside all day, but they didn't.