What kind of season can Ty Chandler have in this offense?

#126
#126
jasonvol18 said:
Well this article says Fant is 225 and is from April. So once again you are wrong. And sorry, I was wrong London is 218 and not 220. That's a huge weight difference from 218-220 but I can admit I was off by 2 pounds.
Tennessee Vols football: Princeton Fant returns at running back, where Vols think he'll 'have more success'

JP has been quoted in Articles, live interviews and Podcasts about wanting bigger RB's. I didn't say he wouldn't utilize a smaller back but that won't be the norm. But I can ask you to find somewhere that says JP wants smaller backs also. Atleast my argument has proof straight from his and Helton's mouth. You just make up stuff on the fly to help you argue your side. The SOS was valid because I based it off games Chryst played in, just like I did equally for JG. Not sure why that confuses you, it's not rocket science. I haven't bashed once bashed any arguments for your side and I very easily could. But it's much easier letting you embarrass yourself and keeps me from having to stoop to your level. If that makes you feel pretty and like a bada$$, then I'm all for self confidence. Whatever works for you bro.
Click to expand...
1. I never claimed. Pruitt said he wants smaller backs, just that they’ll be able to work with some of the smaller guys we have. If you have to purposefully misrepresent someone’s argument to prop your own up, you’re making a s*****y argument.

2. The SOS is not valid the way you used it. You harped on Stanford’s SOS for the entire 2016 season being higher than Tennessee’s, but failed to address the fact that all of his starts (save UNC) in 2016 came against sub-.500 teams. Then You got pissy when you were called out for it and asked me to figure out a way to calculate SOS for half a season instead of admitting it was very, very poorly thought out.


3. My bad in Fant. I was wrong there. But the article you listed also listed Banks as 215. So that’s still less than 3 220+ backs. Sorry to upset you by calling you out on it, but you have a track record of very disingenuous and specious posts, so I thought it was worth pointing out that Pruitt bringing in “3 220+ RBs” was hyperbole.
 
#127
#127
jasonvol18 said:
Dude I apologized to the poster for commenting on the wrong post. Instead of being a miserable little Bit8h and waiting to argue with anyone who doesn't share your very educated and well respected opinion. If I'm wrong, I'll say it to that person which I did. But your MIT level criticism is duly noted and appreciated. And BTW, yes the pain meds didn't exactly help and tend to get a lil loopy.
Click to expand...

Sounded like a BS apaology. “I responded to the wrong post.” Yeah...sure. From someone who was harping about watching “every snap of every game” a few posts back your recollection of what plays happened in which game is pretty bad.


FTR, I don’t mind people disagreeing with me, especially when they give a well reasoned and thought out counter argument. I actually agree with many of the conclusions you’ve reached. The reasoning for them is just annoyingly bad is all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#128
#128
Darth_Shiveman said:
Sounded like a BS apaology. “I responded to the wrong post.” Yeah...sure. From someone who was harping about watching “every snap of every game” a few posts back your recollection of what plays happened in which game is pretty bad.


FTR, I don’t mind people disagreeing with me, especially when they give a well reasoned and thought out counter argument. I actually agree with many of the conclusions you’ve reached. The reasoning for them is just annoyingly bad is all.
Click to expand...

Dang you're awfully whiny these days.

Chandler is not Kamara in terms of body type. So stop with the 215 crap. I know that's where you're basing that from. Chandler is also already benching and squatting just as much as Kamara does now.

You don't mind disagreement? Of course not, because then you couldn't bi+c#...

Stop being soft...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#130
#130
LittleVol said:
Dang you're awfully whiny these days.

Chandler is not Kamara in terms of body type. So stop with the 215 crap. I know that's where you're basing that from. Chandler is also already benching and squatting just as much as Kamara does now.

You don't mind disagreement? Of course not, because then you couldn't bi+c#...

Stop being soft...
Click to expand...
Didn’t say he’s Kamara in body type. Just that he has the frame to bulk up to 215 or so eventually. That’s my belief anyway. We’ll see if he does or not.

FWIW, I wasn’t thinking about Kamara at all when i said that btw. Not sure why you jumped to that conclusion and felt so sure about it. I was thinking more about the fact that he’s got decent height and he still looks like his frame could carry more bulk than now. If he continues playing football and gets an opportunity at the next level, I think we’ll see his final playing weight be in the 210-215 range. I’ll own up to it if I’m wrong.


Not sure what disagreements online have to do with being soft or not. I’m guess you just have hurt fee fees and wanted an opportunity to lash out at me. If that’s the case, then I apologize for whatever I said that hurt you. I didn’t realize you were so emotionally fragile.

Edit: also, got a link on Chandler’s bench and squat being the same as Kamara, or is this just more of you pretending to be an insider for attention?
 
Last edited:
#133
#133
Roustabout said:
You serious Clark?
Click to expand...
One of the most highly rated RBs in the country his hs senior year and suddenly he can't play and the new staff wants to run him off, oh and he's a home state youngster by the way. I'm with you brah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#136
#136
its a really good fit for him. it requires a patient, quick accelerating back who can also be a wr out of the backfield and have extremely good speed. this is why damien harris is the perfect back for alabama. chandler is very similar!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#137
#137
Darth_Shiveman said:
Sounded like a BS apaology. “I responded to the wrong post.” Yeah...sure. From someone who was harping about watching “every snap of every game” a few posts back your recollection of what plays happened in which game is pretty bad.


FTR, I don’t mind people disagreeing with me, especially when they give a well reasoned and thought out counter argument. I actually agree with many of the conclusions you’ve reached. The reasoning for them is just annoyingly bad is all.
Click to expand...

Guess it's a good thing I put zero stock in your opinion, especially when I wasn't even talking to you. Just because I watched every snap doesn't mean I can give you a play by play of every game. I'm also betting you can't either.

You are entitled to feel however you want about me and anything I post. Hell I find most of your responses to be uneducated and just wanting to be argumentative. But I'm sure you care about my opinion anymore than I care about yours. I find it a little creepy you negatively post against anything I say but I'm not mad at you. If it gets you through what appears to be a lot of dark and gloomy days,then please continue doing so. I have always had a soft spot for charity cases, so one more addition is welcomed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#138
#138
lexkyvol said:
its a really good fit for him. it requires a patient, quick accelerating back who can also be a wr out of the backfield and have extremely good speed. this is why damien harris is the perfect back for alabama. chandler is very similar!
Click to expand...

Harris is a physical RB and is 220+ lbs. It's been beat to death in the media how Chandler may not be a good fit for our offense, because of his size. He would be a good compliment to a bigger RB and create mismatches out of the backfield and in open spaces. But not sure he can run over defensive players and break tackle's consistently. Not saying he can't, but it's hard to say a player can do something when he hasn't shown it yet.
 
#139
#139
jasonvol18 said:
Guess it's a good thing I put zero stock in your opinion, especially when I wasn't even talking to you. Just because I watched every snap doesn't mean I can give you a play by play of every game. I'm also betting you can't either.

You are entitled to feel however you want about me and anything I post. Hell I find most of your responses to be uneducated and just wanting to be argumentative. But I'm sure you care about my opinion anymore than I care about yours. I find it a little creepy you negatively post against anything I say but I'm not mad at you. If it gets you through what appears to be a lot of dark and gloomy days,then please continue doing so. I have always had a soft spot for charity cases, so one more addition is welcomed!
Click to expand...
Either be more accurate with with your info or don’t get you’re panties in a wad when you’re corrected on it. It’s that simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#140
#140
jasonvol18 said:
Harris is a physical RB and is 220+ lbs. It's been beat to death in the media how Chandler may not be a good fit for our offense, because of his size. He would be a good compliment to a bigger RB and create mismatches out of the backfield and in open spaces. But not sure he can run over defensive players and break tackle's consistently. Not saying he can't, but it's hard to say a player can do something when he hasn't shown it yet.
Click to expand...

i saw both play in high school. they are similar, except chandler has more homerun speed, harris may be a little quicker first few steps. harris at that age was very similar....which is probably why it took him a few years to become the featured back. weightroom
 
#141
#141
Darth_Shiveman said:
Either be more accurate with with your info or don’t get you’re panties in a wad when you’re corrected on it. It’s that simple.
Click to expand...

Lmao..you correcting a poster on anything would be like Butch Jones trying to correct Saban on what defensive play to call. Thanks Butch Jr For that laugh! Made my day!
 
#143
#143
jasonvol18 said:
Well this article says Fant is 225 and is from April. So once again you are wrong. And sorry, I was wrong London is 218 and not 220. That's a huge weight difference from 218-220 lb
Click to expand...

:crazy:

7XQa.gif
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top