Absolutely. If we can manage to absorb the absurd number of injuries we've had at key positions and still manage to hit that 10-2 bar that so many had set, that's a successful season in my opinion.
However, we still have some work to do to finish with a top five class.
Always great to see you posting daj. ZJC had just posted a question in another thread that made me think of you: "How many coaches consistently win games they aren't supposed to?" Seconds later, here you are. lol
There are three distinct classes of coaches and their typical performance in relation to talent , 1) those who regularly perform at about what talent predicts(roughly 1 game +/- a year), 2) those who regularly under perform (below 1 standard deviation), and 3) those that over perform (above 1 standard deviation). The vast majority fall in category 1 (80% +/-), with 2 and 3 roughly evenly splitting the remainder.
The thing is, everyone wants a coach in category 3. But, you really dont. Few, if any, of those guys actually recruit at a level high enough to sustain success and win championships, but they over achieve to the point they can play spoiler and gain attention. See: Petrino, Spurrier at SCAR. Oddly, many very stable coaches, with national championship caliber recruiting are severely under valued (Miles/Richt) by their fan bases. The problem is that these teams would flourish in any other conference, and be yearly contenders. The SEC is the most talented conference by far, and sometimes you get results that are misleading (UGA v Vandy). Consider that the average SEC team is as talented as a team in the Oklahoma/Michigan range. Whereas every other conference averages a team as talented as the worst SEC teams. In other words, the worst SEC teams are average in any other conference. Consider that when talking about the ease with which UT should navigate the back half of the schedule.
As I've repeated, talent predicts about 70% of games, but that number goes up in conference championships, and approaches 100% in national championships. It's fools gold to throw the baby out with the bath water. That is, a coach who is improving talent, raw wins, and effect on talent, because you can't beat a team that would regularly beat every other team in the country.
We're doing fine, especially compared to where we've been, and when viewed on an extrapolated trajectory. If we were 100%, beating Bama is unlikely. We are far less than 100%, and still should be better than every other team we play.