What happened to Nick Stephens......

[alaVOL]

Excuse me, but apparently I have missed something. I know Nick threw the 2 interceptions against Wyoming but I haven't heard anything about him playing again.

If JC is going to start against UK why is Stephens not even in the mix?

 

[NationofVols]

He is, he's the #2 which means we'll see him about 7 minutes into the 1st quarter.

 

[RCKYT0P]

I think I have heard his attitude has not been that good.

Against Vandy he was #3....obv. We all know this already

 

[therealUT]

Stephens is not a good quarterback! He replaced Crompton because he did not make huge mistakes. That changed, obviously.

 

[NationofVols]

It took Stephens 4 games to make the amount of mistakes Crompton made in 3 series.

 

[iceman9]

I will be interested to see who starts against UCLA, with a fresh set of eyes, and a even chance for each QB. This should speak volumes in comparison of coaching staffs.

 

[alaVOL]

It took Stephens 4 games to make the amount of mistakes Crompton made in 3 series.

This is why I asked what happened. I thought JC had made plenty of mistakes and Stephens had at least completed some nice long balls.

 

[KSVOL]

I hope they play anybody but Crompton. Everytime Crompton is in the game I am reassured that giving Phil the boot was the best thing. I just wish he would take Crompton with him.

 

[utmafia81]

They could put anybody in at quarterback besides Crompton and it would be an improvement IMO.

 

[Knox9552]

The word Desperation comes to mind.

 

[allvol123]

Stephens is not a good quarterback! He replaced Crompton because he did not make huge mistakes. That changed, obviously.

That would in no way prohibit someone from being a better QB than Crompton.

 

[imavolfan]

He is, he's the #2 which means we'll see him about 7 minutes into the 1st quarter.

Only if we play defense first other wise it shouldn't take that long.

 

[CardassianVol]

I think I have heard his attitude has not been that good.

Against Vandy he was #3....obv. We all know this already

It appeared that he was #4.

Fulmer's depth chart goes/went something like this:
1. Crompton
2. Coleman/Berry/Jones
3. Crompton
4. Stephens
5. Crompton
6. Did I try Jonathan yet?

 

[VolsSportsFan]

That would in no way prohibit someone from being a better QB than Crompton.

Exactly; I don't think anyone thinks Stephens is awesome, but anyone with a brain knows he's better than Crompton.
Posted via VolNation Mobile