What are the chances of landing atleast 10

#1
volsgrad89

volsgrad89

Let the mediocrity end!!!
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
757
Likes
1
#1
more of the Rivals 250? UT is on the list of 74 of the 81 listed with no verbal in the Rivals 250. Which ones does everyone feel UT has atleast a 1 in 5 chance of getting? If the odds play out for UT to get just 1 of 7. That would give the Vols another 10 more for a total of 13 in the Rivals 250. Is there any chance it happens?
 
#2
#2
Not to be completely negative but I'm going with 0%. That's essentially what USC pulled out of the 250 last year and we are no where near pulling USC talent right now. I will be one happy Vol if I'm wrong though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3
#3
We are in decent to good shape with the following Rivals250 players that are uncommitted:

#29 - Goodman
#38 - Henry (probably a longshot)
#115 - Koehler
#155 - Bell
#195 - Folston
#206 - Turman
#214 - Harris
#241 - Hatcher
 
#8
#8
Yankee_Vol said:
1 in a million
Click to expand...

1623026_o.gif
 
#9
#9
It's all about this season, a lot of the kids won't commit until after the season, a 9 win year gives us a shot
 
#10
#10
TNRazor said:
It's all about this season, a lot of the kids won't commit until after the season, a 9 win year gives us a shot
Click to expand...

I am going to be very positive. I say UT wins 10 games including a bowl win. I say UT will pull atleast 7 more of the Rivals top 250 giving the Vols atleast 10. Remember, you heard it here first! :)
 
#11
#11
OCIVol said:
We are in decent to good shape with the following Rivals250 players that are uncommitted:

#29 - Goodman
#38 - Henry (probably a longshot)
#115 - Koehler
#155 - Bell
#195 - Folston
#206 - Turman
#214 - Harris
#241 - Hatcher
Click to expand...

Thanks OCI, If UT lands 6 of those 8 and 1 surprise top 250 along with some solid 3 stars that fill needs. I say even the negateers on this board would take it and never look back!!!
 
#12
#12
Imo I wish ncaa would investigate kiffin again....I mean it looks real fishy to me how that sucker can pull tons of talent to an unproven program...I mean serious man what has kiffen proven exactly other then ace recruitin?...heck they pull as much talent as the great saban almost...am I the only one that finds that strange...heck man u could almost say the great monte is unproven in college ball...I mean he's had some decent defenses but nowhere close to what lsu or the bammers had last year....I know usc is a great school but what gives?? greenbacks maybe??
 
#14
#14
TennesseeStudVOL said:
Imo I wish ncaa would investigate kiffin again....I mean it looks real fishy to me how that sucker can pull tons of talent to an unproven program...I mean serious man what has kiffen proven exactly other then ace recruitin?...heck they pull as much talent as the great saban almost...am I the only one that finds that strange...heck man u could almost say the great monte is unproven in college ball...I mean he's had some decent defenses but nowhere close to what lsu or the bammers had last year....I know usc is a great school but what gives?? greenbacks maybe??
Click to expand...

Nothing to investigate imo

USC is the strongest "brand" in college football regardless of W-L record...that brand and California (sunshine, beaches, LA, Hollywood) are what these kids are being sold on
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top