'26 WF Transfer DL Mateen Ibirogna (TTU)

#151
#151
Legion of Doom said:
For transfers yes not on recruiting. They don’t spend 10 percent what we do for high school recruiting. Indiana is the same way.
Click to expand...

Look at commitments on a top 300 list for next year if you don’t think TT is now aggressive with HS players. This includes the top DT.
 
#155
#155
SugarCC said:
The moment some of you realize that whenever it comes down to money, and that's the only priority for a player, Texas Tech is not going to be beaten out...by nobody. Not by Tennessee, not by Alabama, not by Georgia, not even Ohio St. The only schools that can go heels with them, in that arena, are Texas and Oregon. The moment some of you realize this, the wiser you will be. It has NOTHING to do with shape of program, coaching staff, better preparation for draft, being cheap, or being "unserious" (the newest dumbest sh!t some of you have come up with). Campbell will spend $50 million by himself, if he has to.

If we're losing out to TT for transfers because of money alone...EVERYONE ELSE, except the two I mentioned, is losing out as well. Again, nothing to do with being "bargain bin/cheap", or "closing", or being "serious", or any other negative bullsh!t that some of you twits can come up with.

If my math is mathing right, Cody Campbell could cover all 1500 players that have went into the portal since it opened, at $500,000 per player, and still have tens of billions in the bank. Think about that. What am saying?? Asking some if you to think. Now I'M being the twit.
Click to expand...
And Texas Tech still isn’t guaranteed a championship. GBO
 
#157
#157
swchandler1988 said:
You know they aren’t on top right?
Click to expand...
I know they made the CFP this year mainly off of their portal picks. It seems that they are continuing that philosophy which could keep them there. IMHO, they, along with a few others, are at the top.
 
#159
#159
Exiled said:
I know they made the CFP this year mainly off of their portal picks. It seems that they are continuing that philosophy which could keep them there. IMHO, they, along with a few others, are at the top.
Click to expand...
Ah, the ole backtrack. Nice
 
#161
#161
Exiled said:
Ah, the old dimwit reply. Nice.
Click to expand...
Hm. You said “stay at the top”. They got as far as we did in the playoffs. Does that mean we were at the top last year? See my point? If you inserted OSUs name here then that makes sense since they’re consistently in the natty discussion or winning it. This is the first year TTU has been relevant since Mike Leach coached them. I’m annoyed i had to explain this to you
 
#162
#162
swchandler1988 said:
Hm. You said “stay at the top”. They got as far as we did in the playoffs. Does that mean we were at the top last year? See my point? If you inserted OSUs name here then that makes sense since they’re consistently in the natty discussion or winning it. This is the first year TTU has been relevant since Mike Leach coached them. I’m annoyed i had to explain this to you
Click to expand...
I did. At the top to me means in the CFP with an opportunity to win it all. Not just the winner as it seems you want to argue. TTU had a great year, made the playoffs and are spending like they want to stay there. That was my point and the fact that you couldn’t comprehend that says way more about you and your comprehension abilities. I’m done with you.
1767927076909.gif
 
#163
#163
Exiled said:
I did. At the top to me means in the CFP with an opportunity to win it all. Not just the winner as it seems you want to argue. TTU had a great year, made the playoffs and are spending like they want to stay there. That was my point and the fact that you couldn’t comprehend that says way more about you and your comprehension abilities. I’m done with you.
View attachment 804965
Click to expand...
Then why did you “follow” me
 
#164
#164
swchandler1988 said:
Hm. You said “stay at the top”. They got as far as we did in the playoffs. Does that mean we were at the top last year? See my point? If you inserted OSUs name here then that makes sense since they’re consistently in the natty discussion or winning it. This is the first year TTU has been relevant since Mike Leach coached them. I’m annoyed i had to explain this to you
Click to expand...
Actually they didn’t cause they started with a bye so they were already closer.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top