Here's where the writer lost me; he readily admits the preseason polls are meaningless and carries on with his own dislike for them in general, but then acts like "how dare we hand Tennessee such a lofty position inside the top-10".
Secondly, why do these national writers believe so much of the positioning of these polls should be based on past performance? Sure, we are 0-9 vs top-10 teams under Jones, but we are vastly more talented AND experienced than at any other time under his watch. So why continue to punish the 2016 Vols for the failure of less talented, less experienced previous teams? Especially, if like the writer admits, he thinks they have a good chance to finish in the top-10 by season's end anyway.