Was there a block in the back on that INT

#1

Infinite_vol615

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
1,841
Likes
0
#1
Manning got pushed in the back after he threw that pick.. Is that not a penalty?

Did anyone else see this?
 
#7
#7
The Saints tackles held on about every play. they held Dallas Clark 2 or 3 times as well...I'm sure the Colts got away with a few as well.
 
#9
#9
no that wasn't a penalty. 2nd if it was then your saying peyton was running from the play instead preventing the td
 
#11
#11
Manning got pushed in the back after he threw that pick.. Is that not a penalty?

Did anyone else see this?

25yzkie.gif
 
#12
#12
Peyton still has problems winning "the big one."

NOT TRUE!!! he has won a superbowl many big time qb never do as in marino... im sure people will be saying he chocked but waynes route was really wierd lookin and that play didnt change the game bc the colts defense couldnt stop the colts after the 1st quarter
 
#13
#13
no, and with the amount of time that would have been left after either a scoreless or likely FG drive by the saints, it really would have ended the same
 
#15
#15
He won a Super Bowl. That argument died 3 years ago. Get over it.

There's no argument that he can, and has, won the ultimate "big one". But the vast majority of his career has been spent coming up just short when the stakes were at their highest, and it happened again tonight.
 
#16
#16
There's no argument that he can, and has, won the ultimate "big one". But the vast majority of his career has been spent coming up just short when the stakes were at their highest, and it happened again tonight.

I wouldnt quite say the "majority" of his career; it's really just that because he had that tag at one point, any time anything like tonite happens in a game it becomes "ol choke manning yuk yuk yuk"

he's really further than he was though i think should be noted at this point......but the average fan (not implying you) also just like to talk sh$t and doesn't care either
 
#17
#17
Well, the tag was definitely appropriate until he won the SB, which was in 2007. So if you define his career as when he came to UT (1994) till the present (2010), the time he spent coming up short in the big one seems to be significantly in the majority.
 
#18
#18
Well, the tag was definitely appropriate until he won the SB, which was in 2007. So if you define his career as when he came to UT (1994) till the present (2010), the time he spent coming up short in the big one seems to be significantly in the majority.

meh but the amount of times he's won - whether it be in playoff games, in regular season games, bowl games, games with seed or division clinching implications, even close regular season games - just doesn't feel balanced out by a few florida games and some playoff games

if i really disliked the colts and manning i could see it as such, but honestly as a neutral party it just doesn't feel right flowing that way (although the same former seems to also like to call anytime they lose his fault too)
 
#19
#19
Well, the tag was definitely appropriate until he won the SB, which was in 2007. So if you define his career as when he came to UT (1994) till the present (2010), the time he spent coming up short in the big one seems to be significantly in the majority.

Then there's a heck of a lot of players that need that tag too. Phillip Rivers, Tony Romo, to name a few. I guess Favre and Steve Young fit as well since they only won 1 Super Bowl and the majority of the time they didn't "win the big one" as you say. Put Elway in there as well, he was 2-3 in Super Bowls...that's a losing record so the majority of the time he couldn't "win the big one".

See how retarded you are being?
 
#20
#20
Then there's a heck of a lot of players that need that tag too. Phillip Rivers, Tony Romo, to name a few. I guess Favre and Steve Young fit as well since they only won 1 Super Bowl and the majority of the time they didn't "win the big one" as you say. Put Elway in there as well, he was 2-3 in Super Bowls...that's a losing record so the majority of the time he couldn't "win the big one".

See how retarded you are being?

Romo already has that tag.
 
#22
#22
meh but the amount of times he's won - whether it be in playoff games, in regular season games, bowl games, games with seed or division clinching implications, even close regular season games - just doesn't feel balanced out by a few florida games and some playoff games

if i really disliked the colts and manning i could see it as such, but honestly as a neutral party it just doesn't feel right flowing that way (although the same former seems to also like to call anytime they lose his fault too)

I do like Manning, he was a great player at UT, and has been a great player in the NFL. However, I have to be honest in saying, as a Titans fan, I despise the Colts more than any other team in the NFL. I liked the Colts when Manning first went there, but once the Titans came to Nashville, I've been all in on them, and it's difficult to wish much success on a team that seems to beat the crap out of the Titans every time they play.
 
#23
#23
I do like Manning, he was a great player at UT, and has been a great player in the NFL. However, I have to be honest in saying, as a Titans fan, I despise the Colts more than any other team in the NFL. I liked the Colts when Manning first went there, but once the Titans came to Nashville, I've been all in on them, and it's difficult to wish much success on a team that seems to beat the crap out of the Titans every time they play.

huh, see i view the jags have always been more the hated/rival team (and that used to be followed by the afc central teams, not anymore); to me, yeah the colts are good, but there's no history to make them more rival/hatred. they're just a good team in the same division
 
#25
#25
Then there's a heck of a lot of players that need that tag too. Phillip Rivers, Tony Romo, to name a few. I guess Favre and Steve Young fit as well since they only won 1 Super Bowl and the majority of the time they didn't "win the big one" as you say. Put Elway in there as well, he was 2-3 in Super Bowls...that's a losing record so the majority of the time he couldn't "win the big one".

See how retarded you are being?

It could be argued that both QBs have better talent around them and better Defenses.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top