Vols, Kiffin make Bottom Ten

#2
#2
That fact this guy would attach his name to such a load of BS, show's how much self respect he has. Seriously.
 
#3
#3
What the heck is that? Are they saying Tennessee is one of the ten worst teams in college football? UT is the only team on that list with more than 3 wins last season. Absurd!!!
 
#4
#4
Its just the way it is most of the media wants to see Tennessee and Lane Kiffin fall flat on our face, I can't wait to see what their reaction is when Kiffin gets this thing turned around, they will probably all say that it was great and they all thought it was great.
 
#6
#6
They have to include some big-name schools with large fanbases to get you to read it.

How many fans of the actual bottom 10 are spending any time reading about their team or clicking on a site?

This is the kind of journalism you should look out for -- no college football writer really believes Tennessee or Washington is in the bottom 10 of college football.

They are preying on your insecurities and fears.

Ridiculous, but obviously effective.

:zeitung_lesen:
 
#7
#7
I don't even know what this list is supposed to be about. It was completely useless last year, more of the same this year. Out of all lists, this list would most certainly make my Bottom 10.
 
#8
#8
Ridiculous is right. Five wins is more than twice what just about everyone else on that list has.

Bring it.
 
#9
#9
ESPN loves to hate on UT. If UT had Tebow on our team he never would have one the Heisman, that is just the way it is. I love Eric Berry, but he does not have a chance to win the Heisman because he plays on Tennessee. This just pisses me off, because the best player does not win, its a popularity contest that ESPN controls.
 
#12
#12
We don't even get a power T logo...it's a pic of kiffin. I love how ESPN hates us with a passion...
 
#13
#13
That's fine with me! I say let them keep underestimating us. I'd rather stay under the radar and surprise opponents than have high expectations this year.
 
#17
#17
They have to include some big-name schools with large fanbases to get you to read it.

How many fans of the actual bottom 10 are spending any time reading about their team or clicking on a site?

This is the kind of journalism you should look out for -- no college football writer really believes Tennessee or Washington is in the bottom 10 of college football.

They are preying on your insecurities and fears.

Ridiculous, but obviously effective.

:zeitung_lesen:


I agree with almost everything you said, but Washington is in the bottom 10. In fact, Washington State should be in there too.
 
#18
#18
I promise you Washington could beat 20 teams -- albeit, non-BCS conference teams, by 3 touchdowns.

Folks are quick to forget that success is relative
 
#21
#21
Coming in at No. 5...

Tennessee Volunteers, Washington Huskies catch Bottom 10 dance fever - ESPN

Just ridiculous.

Discuss amongst yourselves.

Whoever financed this kid's journalism degree should be burying their heads in their hands, because this article shows his education was a spectacular failure.

I love that EVERYONE is kicking us while we are down. It will make it that much sweeter when we grab their boot, twist their ankle, and curbstomp their kneecap.
 
#22
#22
They have to include some big-name schools with large fanbases to get you to read it.

How many fans of the actual bottom 10 are spending any time reading about their team or clicking on a site?

This is the kind of journalism you should look out for -- no college football writer really believes Tennessee or Washington is in the bottom 10 of college football.

They are preying on your insecurities and fears.

Ridiculous, but obviously effective.

:zeitung_lesen:
I would have read it, but my alma mater has spent a considerable amount of time on the list over the past decade.
 
#23
#23
Obviously a personal shot at CLK. You'll notice in the list at the bottom that all the team's logos are shown except Tennessee's; which is a picture of Lane's mug!!! I love it.
 
#24
#24
The Michael Jackson referances is what made me throw up. ESPN must have needed some material pretty bad to put something like that out. Horrible.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#25
#25
They have to include some big-name schools with large fanbases to get you to read it.

How many fans of the actual bottom 10 are spending any time reading about their team or clicking on a site?

This is the kind of journalism you should look out for -- no college football writer really believes Tennessee or Washington is in the bottom 10 of college football.

They are preying on your insecurities and fears.

Ridiculous, but obviously effective.

:zeitung_lesen:
Dang, now that you spell it out, that method actually sounds kind of familiar.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top