(VolunteerHillbilly @ Jul 18 said:If we have any hope at all of winning it's going to have to be more like:
Vols 38, Bears 34.
I'm pretty confident that if we can't score 30 points we lose.
They have 2 good backs and their receivers can catch. They averaged 34-35 PPG last year and they will probably be better this year. I think the Vols proved last year that you can have the best defense going but without some O you can't win. This is going to be a tough game IMO. It is kind of unfortunate that it's the first game of the season because we could easily lose and then the whole season coud spiral out of control before you know it. On the upside, the average fan, who doesn't spend daily time reading preseason guides and board like this, will assume that UT should beat a "soft" PAC-10 team and the call for CPF's head will pick up a lot of steam if the Vols lose.(orange+white=heaven @ Jul 18 said:I really think our defense can put a better clamp on 'em than 30ish.
I mean we keep hearing about run game with these guys, and Chavis has cut his SEC teeth stopping fine tailbacks...
(VolunteerHillbilly @ Jul 18 said:On the upside, the average fan, who doesn't spend daily time reading preseason guides and board like this, will assume that UT should beat a "soft" PAC-10 team and the call for CPF's head will pick up a lot of steam if the Vols lose.
the other thing to consider about this game, is that it is the first game of the season...neither team will have any game speed experience, and will likely be a bit rusty to say the least....i would think there will be a few key mistakes by both teams, and the one that captializes most often on those mistakes will probably win....(orange+white=heaven @ Jul 18 said:Here's hoping you gotta find a different silver lining after the game...eace:
I respect that ppg average, and I'm certain it won't escape the staff at UT, but don't know that Cal can live up to it. I like the odds that our "D" can keep them 6-8 points under that average.
Your's isn't the only voice talking shootout, and I see the merits of the argument, but I'll plop my ten bucks on Chavis and then sit and watch with my fingers crossed...
(VolunteerHillbilly @ Jul 18 said:If we have any hope at all of winning it's going to have to be more like:
Vols 38, Bears 34.
I'm pretty confident that if we can't score 30 points we lose.
(jakez4ut @ Jul 18 said:you know what i'm talking about, when a guy is wrapped up but still keeps churning, he won't go down trying to gain that extra yardd, (don't get me wrong, i like and expect the effort, but there are times you should just go down) and the ball pops out...or the qb is searching and for a split second thinks he's open, and then realizes just after he releases the ball, he made a fatal mistake...
"The only thing we don't have on this team is a lot of experience on the offensive line. We lost three starters who were drafted in the NFL. We've got some talent there. They just haven't been on the field yet."
(VolunteerHillbilly @ Jul 18 said:They have 2 good backs and their receivers can catch. They averaged 34-35 PPG last year and they will probably be better this year. I think the Vols proved last year that you can have the best defense going but without some O you can't win. This is going to be a tough game IMO. It is kind of unfortunate that it's the first game of the season because we could easily lose and then the whole season coud spiral out of control before you know it. On the upside, the average fan, who doesn't spend daily time reading preseason guides and board like this, will assume that UT should beat a "soft" PAC-10 team and the call for CPF's head will pick up a lot of steam if the Vols lose.
(utvolpj @ Jul 18 said:I found this interesting
Combine that with a question mark at QB and I see a positive. Also a plus considering the new guys we have on the D-line.
(VolinArizona @ Jul 19 said:Cal had one of the better scoring defenses in the PAC 10 last season. They have two very very very good CBs in Hughes and Mixon (combined for 22 PBUs and 8 INTs). MLB Desmond Bishop is a stud, and sophomore Felder started 8 games last season. And of course the amazing dline.
We might see a 28-27 type of game. Maybe 27-21, 27-24. Cal was held to 28 or less points 5 times in 2005: USC, Stanford, Arizona, Oregon State, and Oregon. Besides USC, we have more defensive talent than the other 4 teams, but Cal will be FAR BETTER in 2006 on offense than 2005. Cal, IMHO, is probably the toughest game in terms of talent on the schedule. Florida is a close 2nd.
(kptvol @ Jul 19 said:I have a hard time believing they are nearly as talented as LSU, Georgia, or Florida. I mean, LSU's second string tailback went in the first round of the draft last year. They also have the top safety in the nation and two QBs (maybe 3) that are good enough to play probably anywhere in the nation. Not to mention they destroyed a very good Miami team last year. I would say LSU is the most talented team we will play, with Georgia and Florida following.