Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 55,245
- Likes
- 55,442
You build up the valuation to borrow on the shares. Zero income tax. However, in order for this to be a viable strategy, you would have to sell the shares at some future point. This creates a cycle of ownership that isn’t good.A lot of times private equity has a different definition of ROI than. Most people think the ROI of buying a business is how much revenue it can generate. A lot of times private equity is more concerned with building the valuation of the business, possibly to be sold later.
So for example, I'm a fan of Chelsea FC (a soccer team in England's Premier League), and they were just bought a about 3 or 4 years ago by a private equity for something like $3.5 billion. I think since they've taken over they've spent almost a billion dollars of additional money in just buying top young players alone (in world soccer, player transactions revolve around clubs/franchises buying players and their contracts). The goal of the investments is that more wins and trophies will bolster the valuation of the club longterm.
So how private equity in college football might work could be the same where they put a valuation on the football program, and the goal is to build the brand by winning, building the brand, etc. At least that's what I'm assuming.
not necessarily, you still get regular income to cover general expenses and stuff and profit from that. I was just saying that's not the primary driver like most people think.You build up the valuation to borrow on the shares. Zero income tax. However, in order for this to be a viable strategy, you would have to sell the shares at some future point. This creates a cycle of ownership that isn’t good.
Private equity rarely invests more money in the business they acquire. They look for cost savings and efficiencies. Typical savings come from restructured debt and cutting payroll while increasing pressure on key metrics. They reduce coworkers by 20% typically and then pay other coworkers' higher salaries. These salaries come with high performance expectations. Overall payroll reduces tremendously. Think of it like this. You sell your business that has 10 people. The new owner removes 4 coworkers (saving massive money with labor, benefits, etc). They give the remaining 6 anywhere from a 10-20% increase (or overtime). Fill gaps with part-timers.A lot of times private equity has a different definition of ROI than. Most people think the ROI of buying a business is how much revenue it can generate. A lot of times private equity is more concerned with building the valuation of the business, possibly to be sold later.
So for example, I'm a fan of Chelsea FC (a soccer team in England's Premier League), and they were just bought a about 3 or 4 years ago by a private equity for something like $3.5 billion. I think since they've taken over they've spent almost a billion dollars of additional money in just buying top young players alone (in world soccer, player transactions revolve around clubs/franchises buying players and their contracts). The goal of the investments is that more wins and trophies will bolster the valuation of the club longterm.
So how private equity in college football might work could be the same where they put a valuation on the football program, and the goal is to build the brand by winning, building the brand, etc. At least that's what I'm assuming.
It's crazy GFW. I have experience with these types. I have watched them bleed and close 60 retail locations. 250 jobs gone in 12 months. Use the money from that venture to fund another from the cash flow. It was easy to do. Flatter the corporate franchise director. Sway him with the portfolio owned and some fancy presentation showing other brand success. Take out a major bank loan. Buy the stores. Then start good for a few months. Then, layoffs begin at the home office, followed by layoffs in the field. Finally, they stop purchasing inventory. The coworkers know something is desperatley wrong but they are lied to. Finally, they stop paying bank loan. The Franchisor is left with the bag and at that point there are no buyers because the business is dead. Remaining staff get fired when the bank takes over and liquidates.spot on ^
one of the major drivers of the enshittification of everything you once loved is due to PE
Bingo. There is a lot of different versions of PE. But the business models tend to be the same when it comes to focusing on dividend returns for shareholders. Most PE firms look to quarterly profits instead of long term holdings. My experience is all in property management. PE only holds the property for 3-5 years, has different occupancy/profits goals, and all PE purchases tend to circle towards the real estate. When PE buys a chain restaurant/retail, the building and real estate under it are the more important assets.A lot of times private equity has a different definition of ROI than. Most people think the ROI of buying a business is how much revenue it can generate. A lot of times private equity is more concerned with building the valuation of the business, possibly to be sold later.
So for example, I'm a fan of Chelsea FC (a soccer team in England's Premier League), and they were just bought a about 3 or 4 years ago by a private equity for something like $3.5 billion. I think since they've taken over they've spent almost a billion dollars of additional money in just buying top young players alone (in world soccer, player transactions revolve around clubs/franchises buying players and their contracts). The goal of the investments is that more wins and trophies will bolster the valuation of the club longterm.
So how private equity in college football might work could be the same where they put a valuation on the football program, and the goal is to build the brand by winning, building the brand, etc. At least that's what I'm assuming.
I work for a PE REIT(after they paid 25% above cap for the property management company where I work). As long as the dividends are continuously reinvested, little to no taxes are ever paid. There are a ton of additional rules/laws of which to adhere (I am sure you know).You build up the valuation to borrow on the shares. Zero income tax. However, in order for this to be a viable strategy, you would have to sell the shares at some future point. This creates a cycle of ownership that isn’t good.
Realizing I just repeated what you already said...I will see myself to the doorYou build up the valuation to borrow on the shares. Zero income tax. However, in order for this to be a viable strategy, you would have to sell the shares at some future point. This creates a cycle of ownership that isn’t good.
Can you explain what private equity investing is? And why it's bad for college football? I literally have no idea
Always strikes me as a slicker version of a ponzi scheme. The money is *actually* there for at least part of the time, but the end goal is to dump it out and the taxpayers have to pay for it all over while they walk away with their new money to do it all over again.Can you explain what private equity investing is? And why it's bad for college football? I literally have no idea
