Tyler Maples

#26
#26
Have any of Maryville's players really panned out though? I remember Carl Stewart at Auburn, Nick Black at Clemson and we had a LB a few years back and South Carolina has Cade Thompson.....Those guys were just okay - Maryville is such a good program (no public school anywhere takes football more seriously) that their players maximize their full potential while in HS....It makes for a lot of overrated busts at the next level...Maples will never see the field here unless it is on special teams.

Off the top of my head Danny Spradlin turned out to be a pretty good LB, but that has been awhile.
 
#27
#27
I have to say that if I'm a marketer at any level I am loving the name "Tyler Maples." Reminds me of "Major Applewhite." If Maples makes it to the NFL, he's got a bright future for some advertising agency.
 
#32
#32
Keep in mind that the NFL combine uses electronically timed 40 numbers, and the fastest EVER has Fabian Washington in 2005 with a 4.25.

The Deangelo Hall 4.15 was handtimed on a fast track. He does not run a 4.15 electronically timed 40.
 
#33
#33
Keep in mind that the NFL combine uses electronically timed 40 numbers, and the fastest EVER has Fabian Washington in 2005 with a 4.25.

The Deangelo Hall 4.15 was handtimed on a fast track. He does not run a 4.15 electronically timed 40.

It's worse than that. As I stated earlier there is an INCREDIBLE amount of disinformation on this subject. The Fabian Washington time is so widely distributed that even I fell for it. The confusion is that the NFL combine does use electronic timing now but, and damned if I know why, apparently also still hand-time. Scroll down towards the bottom under "defensive backs"

NFL Draft Blitz

For those not wanting to bother Washington's 40's were hand-timed at 4.25 and 4.28 while electronically timed at 4.33 and 4.37. Now, there's NOTHING wrong with a good hand-time, which I'm sure the NFL combine has. (too much money riding on it) Having said that, NEVER mix hand and electronic times.

And D'Angelo Hall couldn't run a 4.15 40 downhill in a hurricane, even hand-timed by anyone that knew what they were doing.
 
#34
#34
It's no wonder prospects turn down the chance to run at the combine. They can boast about a 4.2, and never have to prove it legitimately.
 
#35
#35
It's no wonder prospects turn down the chance to run at the combine. They can boast about a 4.2, and never have to prove it legitimately.

Bullseye.

At the risk of being overly analytic they do still have to run, which gives us the "pro-day" workout. A nice home case would be our own Donte Stallworth. He had the scouts show up and laid down some sub-4.3's (the guy is fast) on his fast home track. If he'd run the electronic combine at Indy he'd have put up times similar to Washington's if not even a few 100ths slower due to the differences in running surfaces. It just sounds soooo cool to have "sub-4.3 40" on your resume. And as long as people are comparing it to times run electronically at the combine, it's quite deceptive.
 
#36
#36
I have to say that if I'm a marketer at any level I am loving the name "Tyler Maples." Reminds me of "Major Applewhite." If Maples makes it to the NFL, he's got a bright future for some advertising agency.

Not clever and you are no scout.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top