WHY would it be challenged? All the cards are in Evan’s deck. He’s basically a free agent until he enrolls. I could more envision other highly coveted recruits attempting to engineer the same situation.The
The previous link was a FAQ, so don't go there. This is the actual language as the other poster included the full link and I read that full document.
They actually put null and void language in there. That makes my head hurt still because if something doesn't exist how can you put another clause against it? I wonder with all the legal challenging going on now against the NCAA if someone would challenge this??!!
Nah, man. It means we're getting him. If matts is wrong, that proves unequivocally that he's a fake insider. @Big Gucci Sosa, am I doing this right?I took it as we're right in this.
I am sure that this has been rehashed, but if Georgia's admin pushed for them to void the NLI, how are they still recruiting him?
Yea, this would be a huge miss for matt if he does not choose the Vols. His insider status would take a monster hit. I mean that emoji all but said Evans was locked in.Nah, man. It means we're getting him. If matts is wrong, that proves unequivocally that he's a fake insider. @Big Gucci Sosa, am I doing this right?
Usually means a good thing. Remember when it popped up in the Torrance Gibson thread tho. That did end up being good for UT...but for other reasons.It would be nice to win this one. Not sure what Matts wink means but I hope it at least means that we do have a good chance. UG would waste such good talent.
The
The previous link was a FAQ, so don't go there. This is the actual language as the other poster included the full link and I read that full document.
They actually put null and void language in there. That makes my head hurt still because if something doesn't exist how can you put another clause against it? I wonder with all the legal challenging going on now against the NCAA if someone would challenge this??!!