UTVOLKeith
punished good deeds
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,013
- Likes
- 232
Was he right to "order" her out of the car after her perceived defiance?
YUP!!!!
Pennsylvania v. Mimms, a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision, says it's reasonable and not a violation of the Fourth Amendment for an officer to order a motorist to exit their vehicle following a traffic stop and conduct a pat-down to check for weapons.
Looks like she became a 'radical cop hater' explains her attitude and we all know who drove that idea!
Any order that doesnt violate specified Civil Rights and doesnt otherwise violate another State or Federal law is considered a lawful order. That is the limit of his authority. He did not ask her to do anything that is prohibited by law so his requests were lawful orders. She was required by law to comply even if she didnt agree with it or like it.
She "CHOSE" to be combative and resist!
Im not going to defend "everything" the cop said or did, but the whole episode would have played out entirely differently if she had been cooperative, non- confrontational, and respectful from the start. Smart people do not pick fights with cops.
Btw, I'm white also, and the son of a cop. In my view smart people should question the police when they are in the wrong.
You question them in the court room...her lawyer could have got the video!
She was in the wrong, shes the one that made illegal lane change and then refused LE order
She could have just as easily, said yes sir no sir took her warning for the lane change and went on
What did he do that was wrong?
