EastTNVol95
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2022
- Messages
- 610
- Likes
- 6,715
Sorry in the era of the portal instate losses are no longer brutal at all. It doesn’t matter if we don’t get any of the top instate guys.Picked up a crystal ball from a Kentucky insider today unfortunately.
Would be brutal to lose both Brown/Barnes to them when you've already missed on Chandler and Simon in the last couple weeks.
You really have two methods to build rosters; youth>development>retention, or transfer portal roster sculpting. You have to do one of them very well. If we show an eagerness and an ability to flex in the portal next year, I think it will help alleviate the concerns of those who see us losing kids in our own state left and right. If we take another half-hearted stab at the portal next year, people will be rightfully concerned.Sorry in the era of the portal instate losses are no longer brutal at all. It doesn’t matter if we don’t get any of the top instate guys.
Sorry in the era of the portal instate losses are no longer brutal at all. It doesn’t matter if we don’t get any of the top instate guys.
Still going to be healthy size. Heupel wants to build a team properly through high school recruiting still, but you simply can't justify paying a lot of money to a kid bc he is rated high if he is not going to play for 2-3 years and then transfer. Or if you think you can find similar caliber of player for a better rate. I know the optics suck when you lose out on in-state kids, but there are so many talented players each class on the perimeter and they are in the mix for a ton of them, at least defensivelySo what do we think in terms of total numbers in the high school class?
