Thread 5 Years Ago that would never have existed.

#1

FireFulmer

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
17
Likes
0
#1
5 years ago to see this or hear this would have made us laugh. But, NCAAM team preseason #13 is disappointing, should be higher, and the NCAAF is in the 100's. Kind of ironic.
 
#2
#2
5 years ago to see this or hear this would have made us laugh. But, NCAAM team preseason #13 is disappointing, should be higher, and the NCAAF is in the 100's. Kind of ironic.


Luckily it doesn't matter. Just play ball and win games, everything else will fall in place.
 
#4
#4
Yeah. At least NCAAB has a system that rankings for the most part don't really mean much.
 
#7
#7
i dont like the ranking but do understand it.
Unproven PG, and heavily relying on Freshman in the backcourt.
And from what I understand Woolridge and Hopson have much to learn on D.
 
#8
#8
at this point I think everyone involved would be extremly happy to be number 13 right now!!!!
 
#9
#9
Preseason college basketball rankings are about as worthless as the slugs that try to get my dogs food ocassionally.
 
#11
#11
I think tradition enters into the preseason polls. You have to show consistency for a few years before the media give you what you deserve.
 
#13
#13
it will be fine...preseason basketball polls don't really mean anything. if we win we will move up fast. especially with our schedule. Top 5 after we win the Old Spice
 

VN Store



Back
Top