WesternKyVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
- Messages
- 8,150
- Likes
- 1,221
This is not a "Why did we recruit these guys!" post. It is a "Why did we recruit these guys?" post.
I am new to recruiting and did not follow the recruitment of the current class in the beginning. Like most of the little people, I showed up in January. In the past, I always looked to stars for indications of a player's potential. Recently, several of you have turned me onto Offer lists as the best way to measure talent. This is absolutely logical. The evaluators at Rivals are probably not as good as the evaluators in Gainesville, Baton Rouge, and Tuscaloosa.
So I looked back on our commits and saw nine who had less than impressive offer lists.
I realize that this is for the following reasons:
1. The coaches believe he is a diamond in the rough.
2. We have to fill out our class. We are not getting the pick of the litter these days.
3. He committed so early that other schools never offered.
4. Dooley is looking for high character guys, and that may not be fashionable at every school.
So here's the list that I would like info on. I realize that some of them may never have big time careers at UT. But, to the best of the board's knowledge, why are these guys here, and why do they have unimpressive offer lists.
Feel free to address this anyway you like. I would love for people who have been on top of this since day 1 to go one-by-one through the recruits and give their analysis of their potential and whether they deserve to be here, what they expect, etc.
So here they are:
1. Alan Carson
2. Tino Thomas
3. Devrin Young
4. T. Saulsberry
5. Tom Smith
6. Christian Harris
7. Mack Crowder
8. Brendan Downs
9. G. Orta
Please understand I am not saying that some of these guys won't be eventual starters or even all league caliber players. I am just seeing relatively weak offers and want to know their stories.
I am new to recruiting and did not follow the recruitment of the current class in the beginning. Like most of the little people, I showed up in January. In the past, I always looked to stars for indications of a player's potential. Recently, several of you have turned me onto Offer lists as the best way to measure talent. This is absolutely logical. The evaluators at Rivals are probably not as good as the evaluators in Gainesville, Baton Rouge, and Tuscaloosa.
So I looked back on our commits and saw nine who had less than impressive offer lists.
I realize that this is for the following reasons:
1. The coaches believe he is a diamond in the rough.
2. We have to fill out our class. We are not getting the pick of the litter these days.
3. He committed so early that other schools never offered.
4. Dooley is looking for high character guys, and that may not be fashionable at every school.
So here's the list that I would like info on. I realize that some of them may never have big time careers at UT. But, to the best of the board's knowledge, why are these guys here, and why do they have unimpressive offer lists.
Feel free to address this anyway you like. I would love for people who have been on top of this since day 1 to go one-by-one through the recruits and give their analysis of their potential and whether they deserve to be here, what they expect, etc.
So here they are:
1. Alan Carson
2. Tino Thomas
3. Devrin Young
4. T. Saulsberry
5. Tom Smith
6. Christian Harris
7. Mack Crowder
8. Brendan Downs
9. G. Orta
Please understand I am not saying that some of these guys won't be eventual starters or even all league caliber players. I am just seeing relatively weak offers and want to know their stories.
Last edited: