The Thing (2011)

#2
#2
The Thing from '82 is a great movie. I don't think this new one will add much to what John Carpenter already mastered. But I will still go to see it in the theatre unless the reviews are horrible.
 
#6
#6
i hope i'm wrong, but no way this will be anywhere near as good as the first.
 
#7
#7
can't be as good as the first one unless Wilford Brimley slams defibrillators through a replica's chest cavity only to have it's rib bones turn into teeth that bite Brimley's arms off.
 
#8
#8
sorry thing noob but that was doctor copper (richard dysart), blair got blown up by dynamite
 
#9
#9
noob my ass, I'm just old and haven't seen it in about 20 years.
 
#10
#10
I always thought "The Thing" filmed in 1951 was one of the greatest horror flicks of all time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#12
#12
666 said:
The Thing must be watched atleast once every two weeks
Click to expand...

not gonna happen. Carpenter's best film, "Escape from New York" is watchable maybe twice a year and "Escape from LA" should only be watched while unconscious.
 
#14
#14
speaking of Carpenter, what about They Live? i liked it back in the day.

1988They_Live_poster300.jpg
 
#18
#18
Saw this yesterday, I thought it was pretty good. The effects were pretty nice for the most part, I did think they showed the alien way too much. I also didn't care much for the ship interior shots. I did really like how it ended seamlessly with the start of the '82 version. But yeah, it's a cool watch. Don't really see why it ended up with a Rotten rating on RT. If you watch, stay for the credits.

MEW is purty.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top