Tillman's response:
-------------------------------------------------
First I applaud you for your passion. More people should be as passionate; only about the things that really matter in life.
For what it's worth, I actually like Phillip Fulmer. I like Randy Sanders also. Heres the rub. When I think of being "the best that you can be," we shouldn't give points for underachieving: that includes myself. At no point should one stop seeking to become better at whatever it is he does. I think I'm getting better as a broadcaster, and I would hope that you are better at whatever it is you do than you were last year.
The problem with Phillip is he, and by extention his staff, could be so much better if he trusted outside influences, particularly on the offensive side of the ball.
Few of us reach our full potential with only ourselves to emulate. We all need outside help. Case in point. This past off-season, Norm Chow, the offensive coordinator at USC, spent about two weeks in St. Louis with Coach Martz figuring out creative ways to get the ball to the members of that three headed monster out there in their backfield. I know because I was there for about a week. My former teammate with Houston, Todd McNair is their running backs coach; he game me a great explanation of the value netted as a result.
Phillip's strength is recruiting. He lives and breathes it. As such, I have no problem with that however, every CEO/Coach knows he/she needs to surround themselves with people who have strengths that complement their weaknesses. That doesn't seem to exist at UT. That is the head coaches responsibility to first recognize the need and then to fill it. So, in the end, it really doesn't matter why he won't embrace the notion of developing a more sophisticated scheme, the fact is they don't have or choose not to implement one. And as an analyst, my job is to say what I see. And what I see is an early eighties approach offensively.
They still manage to win because they get better talent. Incidentally, that talent is only partially exploited for it's full value. Without thinking very hard Jason Witten comes to mind. A basic tenant of defense (distribution of assignment based on personnel) gives UT an undecided advantage in every game they play during the years Jason played. He was a man among boys but you'd hardly know it by the way they chose to utilized him. Now they either consciously decided not to exploit his gifts or were not able to. I'll never say that on television, because I'm not at practice every day, and what is more, there are families connected to those coaches and their jobs. What I will say is what I see. So in the end, I think my comments are fair. They're never personal like the venom some of the other volunteer faithful have chosen to spew. That's OK though. That's the beautiful thing about living in this country. People have the right to say what they believe.
I'll end with this...Phillip made a comment back in 2001...He said that tradition doesn't graduate." In one regard, he's right on. On another front I'll have to strongly disagree. Players play the game. Tradition only augments talent. Just ask Jo Pa and the folks at Penn State. One more year of mediocrity and they are in danger of loosing an entire generation that will consider their current "Tradition" about two seconds before they sign with a program with a more recent wining record. Tradition will fall on death ears among the youth of today if you're a loosing program. Tennessee is in no danger of becoming a loser, I just wish they would take it to another level.
So, no I don't dislike Phillip Fulmer, my values don't give me room do dislike or hate anyone; especially the UT program. I suppose I'm like that teacher that wants to see the best be the best. With what they have, they could be so much more. Thats all.
I love the exchange....anytime you want to visit, please hit me with an e-mail.
Regards,
Spencer Tillman
P.S. feel free to share this with the memeber so the "O" club.....(Oran